Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture
Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-y...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 729 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 723 |
container_title | Research on social work practice |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Holosko, Michael J. Barner, John R. Allen, Junior Lloyd |
description | Purpose:
We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States.
Method:
We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites.
Results:
The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively).
Discussion:
The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049731515598374 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1819498015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1113382</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731515598374</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4182410551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd69CAsePK3ObL6PUlqtFDyoeFxCmsjW7mZNtgf_vSkrIoKnecP7gkfIOcI1opQ3CExLihw514pKdkAmGVal5AoPM850ueePyUlKGwCkldATcjVrBjM0oSuWbW_sUARfvIbWdUXTFU_BNmab__h-So682SZ39n2n5GUxf57dl6vHu-XsdlXaSrGhVCAEas01sxUVxnIrGTBvhJEcBGVqLZhX0gMI7rhjAM46KjVbKwOq8nRKLsfcPoaPnUtDvQm72OXKGhVqphUgzyoYVTaGlKLzdR-b1sTPGqHez1H_nSNbLkaLi439kc8fEJFSVWW-HPlk3tyv0v_yvgBMkWSv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819498015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</creator><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States.
Method:
We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites.
Results:
The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively).
Discussion:
The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731515598374</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Citation Analysis ; Classification ; College Faculty ; Educational Research ; Faculty Publishing ; Females ; Graduate Surveys ; Higher education ; Interviews ; Mixed Methods Research ; Productivity ; Scholarship ; Social Work ; Web Sites ; Women ; Women Faculty ; Womens Studies</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731515598374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731515598374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1113382$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Purpose:
We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States.
Method:
We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites.
Results:
The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively).
Discussion:
The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</description><subject>Citation Analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Faculty Publishing</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Graduate Surveys</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women Faculty</subject><subject>Womens Studies</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd69CAsePK3ObL6PUlqtFDyoeFxCmsjW7mZNtgf_vSkrIoKnecP7gkfIOcI1opQ3CExLihw514pKdkAmGVal5AoPM850ueePyUlKGwCkldATcjVrBjM0oSuWbW_sUARfvIbWdUXTFU_BNmab__h-So682SZ39n2n5GUxf57dl6vHu-XsdlXaSrGhVCAEas01sxUVxnIrGTBvhJEcBGVqLZhX0gMI7rhjAM46KjVbKwOq8nRKLsfcPoaPnUtDvQm72OXKGhVqphUgzyoYVTaGlKLzdR-b1sTPGqHez1H_nSNbLkaLi439kc8fEJFSVWW-HPlk3tyv0v_yvgBMkWSv</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Holosko, Michael J.</creator><creator>Barner, John R.</creator><creator>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work</title><author>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Citation Analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Faculty Publishing</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Graduate Surveys</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women Faculty</topic><topic>Womens Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holosko, Michael J.</au><au>Barner, John R.</au><au>Allen, Junior Lloyd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1113382</ericid><atitle>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>723-729</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Purpose:
We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States.
Method:
We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites.
Results:
The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively).
Discussion:
The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1049731515598374</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729 |
issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1819498015 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Citation Analysis Classification College Faculty Educational Research Faculty Publishing Females Graduate Surveys Higher education Interviews Mixed Methods Research Productivity Scholarship Social Work Web Sites Women Women Faculty Womens Studies |
title | Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T10%3A47%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citation%20Impact%20of%20Women%20in%20Social%20Work:%20Exploring%20Gender%20and%20Research%20Culture&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Holosko,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=723-729&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731515598374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4182410551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819498015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1113382&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731515598374&rfr_iscdi=true |