Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture

Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research on social work practice 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729
Hauptverfasser: Holosko, Michael J., Barner, John R., Allen, Junior Lloyd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 729
container_issue 6
container_start_page 723
container_title Research on social work practice
container_volume 26
creator Holosko, Michael J.
Barner, John R.
Allen, Junior Lloyd
description Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites. Results: The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively). Discussion: The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1049731515598374
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1819498015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1113382</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731515598374</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4182410551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd69CAsePK3ObL6PUlqtFDyoeFxCmsjW7mZNtgf_vSkrIoKnecP7gkfIOcI1opQ3CExLihw514pKdkAmGVal5AoPM850ueePyUlKGwCkldATcjVrBjM0oSuWbW_sUARfvIbWdUXTFU_BNmab__h-So682SZ39n2n5GUxf57dl6vHu-XsdlXaSrGhVCAEas01sxUVxnIrGTBvhJEcBGVqLZhX0gMI7rhjAM46KjVbKwOq8nRKLsfcPoaPnUtDvQm72OXKGhVqphUgzyoYVTaGlKLzdR-b1sTPGqHez1H_nSNbLkaLi439kc8fEJFSVWW-HPlk3tyv0v_yvgBMkWSv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819498015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</creator><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites. Results: The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively). Discussion: The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731515598374</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Citation Analysis ; Classification ; College Faculty ; Educational Research ; Faculty Publishing ; Females ; Graduate Surveys ; Higher education ; Interviews ; Mixed Methods Research ; Productivity ; Scholarship ; Social Work ; Web Sites ; Women ; Women Faculty ; Womens Studies</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731515598374$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731515598374$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1113382$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites. Results: The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively). Discussion: The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</description><subject>Citation Analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Faculty Publishing</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Graduate Surveys</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women Faculty</subject><subject>Womens Studies</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd69CAsePK3ObL6PUlqtFDyoeFxCmsjW7mZNtgf_vSkrIoKnecP7gkfIOcI1opQ3CExLihw514pKdkAmGVal5AoPM850ueePyUlKGwCkldATcjVrBjM0oSuWbW_sUARfvIbWdUXTFU_BNmab__h-So682SZ39n2n5GUxf57dl6vHu-XsdlXaSrGhVCAEas01sxUVxnIrGTBvhJEcBGVqLZhX0gMI7rhjAM46KjVbKwOq8nRKLsfcPoaPnUtDvQm72OXKGhVqphUgzyoYVTaGlKLzdR-b1sTPGqHez1H_nSNbLkaLi439kc8fEJFSVWW-HPlk3tyv0v_yvgBMkWSv</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Holosko, Michael J.</creator><creator>Barner, John R.</creator><creator>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work</title><author>Holosko, Michael J. ; Barner, John R. ; Allen, Junior Lloyd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-8066199594c236ac5c7404fa6a7506348d64f87f0065e5e400ece3794d8a082f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Citation Analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Faculty Publishing</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Graduate Surveys</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women Faculty</topic><topic>Womens Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holosko, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barner, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Junior Lloyd</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holosko, Michael J.</au><au>Barner, John R.</au><au>Allen, Junior Lloyd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1113382</ericid><atitle>Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>723-729</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Purpose: We assessed citation impact scholarship of women in the top 25-ranked schools of social work in the United States. Method: We used a mixed methodology. Part 1 was a secondary data analysis of the top-25 U.S. News and World Report ranked schools from 2012 using the Hirsch h-index over a 10-year period. Qualitative interviews were conducted with graduates from top-ranked schools. We then examined the faculty websites. Results: The mean h-score was 18.64. The majority of these women were employed at the University of Washington (n = 6), followed by Columbia University and the Universities of Southern California (n = 3, respectively), Michigan, and California at Berkeley (n = 2, respectively). Discussion: The overall impact scores for these women are significant and speak to a number of factors including negotiating long-standing systemic and structural variables. We continue to describe elements of research cultures, which are essential to our profession’s academic development in today’s corporate university cultures.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1049731515598374</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-7315
ispartof Research on social work practice, 2016-10, Vol.26 (6), p.723-729
issn 1049-7315
1552-7581
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1819498015
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Citation Analysis
Classification
College Faculty
Educational Research
Faculty Publishing
Females
Graduate Surveys
Higher education
Interviews
Mixed Methods Research
Productivity
Scholarship
Social Work
Web Sites
Women
Women Faculty
Womens Studies
title Citation Impact of Women in Social Work: Exploring Gender and Research Culture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T10%3A47%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citation%20Impact%20of%20Women%20in%20Social%20Work:%20Exploring%20Gender%20and%20Research%20Culture&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Holosko,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=723-729&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731515598374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4182410551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819498015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1113382&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731515598374&rfr_iscdi=true