Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations

Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Employee relations 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320
Hauptverfasser: Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K, Miller, Daniel J, Zhang, Weijun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Employee relations
container_volume 19
creator Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K
Miller, Daniel J
Zhang, Weijun
description Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/01425459710170031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_01425459710170031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_4W2_TBK5610M_M</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8AQ2M49iOJTZQlYdoxKaIpTXxQwqkaRunEv17XBWxKasZ6Z5zF5eQawY3jEF5C6zIRSG0YsAUAGcnZMSUKDMFUp-S0T7PEiDOyUWMnwDJ4nxE7mabbTPsJtRvttimj2LnaOe9oxip84Pvl02H3RDpKtA1prxtVxaHZtXFS3IWsI3-6veOyfvjbDF9zuZvTy_T-3lmmSyqzIrSKq5kzSF3PLelruuCgS_Q5rZAIazNtQoyOBdq7RjXQUmHqMuaBymAj0l26G3i4L_Num-W2O8M9l9GpmJhio_cLB5ehWRQmSrxcOD90vfYuj-DgdmvZY7WSsrkf-UINWsX-A9vBmic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><description>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01425459710170031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Bonuses ; China ; Pay structures</subject><ispartof>Employee relations, 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01425459710170031/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01425459710170031/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52664,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><title>Employee relations</title><description>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</description><subject>Bonuses</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Pay structures</subject><issn>0142-5455</issn><issn>1758-7069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8AQ2M49iOJTZQlYdoxKaIpTXxQwqkaRunEv17XBWxKasZ6Z5zF5eQawY3jEF5C6zIRSG0YsAUAGcnZMSUKDMFUp-S0T7PEiDOyUWMnwDJ4nxE7mabbTPsJtRvttimj2LnaOe9oxip84Pvl02H3RDpKtA1prxtVxaHZtXFS3IWsI3-6veOyfvjbDF9zuZvTy_T-3lmmSyqzIrSKq5kzSF3PLelruuCgS_Q5rZAIazNtQoyOBdq7RjXQUmHqMuaBymAj0l26G3i4L_Num-W2O8M9l9GpmJhio_cLB5ehWRQmSrxcOD90vfYuj-DgdmvZY7WSsrkf-UINWsX-A9vBmic</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creator><creator>Miller, Daniel J</creator><creator>Zhang, Weijun</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><author>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bonuses</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Pay structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</au><au>Miller, Daniel J</au><au>Zhang, Weijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</atitle><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>309-320</pages><issn>0142-5455</issn><eissn>1758-7069</eissn><abstract>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</abstract><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/01425459710170031</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5455
ispartof Employee relations, 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320
issn 0142-5455
1758-7069
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_01425459710170031
source Emerald Journals
subjects Bonuses
China
Pay structures
title Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equity,%20equality%20and%20need%20as%20determinants%20of%20pay%20allocations&rft.jtitle=Employee%20relations&rft.au=Giacobbe-Miller,%20Jane%20K&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=309-320&rft.issn=0142-5455&rft.eissn=1758-7069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01425459710170031&rft_dat=%3Cistex_emera%3Eark_67375_4W2_TBK5610M_M%3C/istex_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true