Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations
Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Employee relations 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 320 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Employee relations |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K Miller, Daniel J Zhang, Weijun |
description | Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/01425459710170031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_01425459710170031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_4W2_TBK5610M_M</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8AQ2M49iOJTZQlYdoxKaIpTXxQwqkaRunEv17XBWxKasZ6Z5zF5eQawY3jEF5C6zIRSG0YsAUAGcnZMSUKDMFUp-S0T7PEiDOyUWMnwDJ4nxE7mabbTPsJtRvttimj2LnaOe9oxip84Pvl02H3RDpKtA1prxtVxaHZtXFS3IWsI3-6veOyfvjbDF9zuZvTy_T-3lmmSyqzIrSKq5kzSF3PLelruuCgS_Q5rZAIazNtQoyOBdq7RjXQUmHqMuaBymAj0l26G3i4L_Num-W2O8M9l9GpmJhio_cLB5ehWRQmSrxcOD90vfYuj-DgdmvZY7WSsrkf-UINWsX-A9vBmic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><description>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/01425459710170031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Bonuses ; China ; Pay structures</subject><ispartof>Employee relations, 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01425459710170031/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01425459710170031/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52664,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><title>Employee relations</title><description>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</description><subject>Bonuses</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Pay structures</subject><issn>0142-5455</issn><issn>1758-7069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAez8AQ2M49iOJTZQlYdoxKaIpTXxQwqkaRunEv17XBWxKasZ6Z5zF5eQawY3jEF5C6zIRSG0YsAUAGcnZMSUKDMFUp-S0T7PEiDOyUWMnwDJ4nxE7mabbTPsJtRvttimj2LnaOe9oxip84Pvl02H3RDpKtA1prxtVxaHZtXFS3IWsI3-6veOyfvjbDF9zuZvTy_T-3lmmSyqzIrSKq5kzSF3PLelruuCgS_Q5rZAIazNtQoyOBdq7RjXQUmHqMuaBymAj0l26G3i4L_Num-W2O8M9l9GpmJhio_cLB5ehWRQmSrxcOD90vfYuj-DgdmvZY7WSsrkf-UINWsX-A9vBmic</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creator><creator>Miller, Daniel J</creator><creator>Zhang, Weijun</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</title><author>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K ; Miller, Daniel J ; Zhang, Weijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164M-c58c7376b302d32c89bb410e4ac2c4a55cc297f6fddfb9d139f76daa98b3f6503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Bonuses</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Pay structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weijun</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giacobbe-Miller, Jane K</au><au>Miller, Daniel J</au><au>Zhang, Weijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations</atitle><jtitle>Employee relations</jtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>309-320</pages><issn>0142-5455</issn><eissn>1758-7069</eissn><abstract>Involves a role-play in which Chinese and US managers allocate a hypothetical bonus to a work group. Indicates that Chinese managers employed three distributive rules (i.e. equity, equality and need) placing greatest emphasis on equality. In contrast, US managers employed two distributive rules, equity and equality, placing the greatest emphasis on equity. Chinese managers placed significantly greater emphasis on the need rule than did US managers, although very small amounts were allocated on the basis of need. Discusses implications for appropriate pay design.</abstract><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/01425459710170031</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5455 |
ispartof | Employee relations, 1997-08, Vol.19 (4), p.309-320 |
issn | 0142-5455 1758-7069 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_01425459710170031 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Bonuses China Pay structures |
title | Equity, equality and need as determinants of pay allocations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equity,%20equality%20and%20need%20as%20determinants%20of%20pay%20allocations&rft.jtitle=Employee%20relations&rft.au=Giacobbe-Miller,%20Jane%20K&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=309-320&rft.issn=0142-5455&rft.eissn=1758-7069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/01425459710170031&rft_dat=%3Cistex_emera%3Eark_67375_4W2_TBK5610M_M%3C/istex_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |