A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Live Birth Rates in Day 5 Fresh Versus Vitrified Single Blastocyst Transfer Cycles

Background: The use of frozen embryo transfers (FETs) in assisted reproduction has increased worldwide. Proponents of FETs suggest that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in a fresh transfer impairs endometrial-embryo synchronicity, however there has been conflicting evidence on live birth ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility & reproduction 2022-09, Vol.4 (3n04), p.138-138
Hauptverfasser: KIEU, Violet, POLYAKOV, Alex, ROZEN, Genia, LANTSBERG, Daniel, STERN, Kate, TEH, Wan Tinn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The use of frozen embryo transfers (FETs) in assisted reproduction has increased worldwide. Proponents of FETs suggest that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in a fresh transfer impairs endometrial-embryo synchronicity, however there has been conflicting evidence on live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) outcomes. Aim: To compare LBRs and CPRs between single autologous day 5 fresh versus vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles, in order to investigate the impact of COH on embryo-endometrium asynchrony. Method: A large cross-sectional analysis of 6,002 embryo transfers (ETs), comprising of 3774 fresh and 2228 FET cycles from 2016-2019. Inclusion criteria: first two stimulation cycles, single ET, and no pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Multivariate analysis performed, also sub-group analysis for high-responders (>20 oocytes collected). Results: Univariate analysis showed no absolute difference in LBR (28.3% vs 27.4%, p=0.43) and CPR (32.2% vs 30.9%, p=0.30), however multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly lower LBR (OR 0.864, p
ISSN:2661-3182
2661-3174
DOI:10.1142/S2661318222740504