Overcoming Left-Behindedness
Territorial development theory and practice have witnessed significant change in recent times. This change has increasingly put the spatial dimension at the center of development policies. Although agglomeration-focused policies derived from urbanization and agglomeration economics were once promine...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Territorial development theory and
practice have witnessed significant change in recent times.
This change has increasingly put the spatial dimension at
the center of development policies. Although
agglomeration-focused policies derived from urbanization and
agglomeration economics were once prominent, their empirical
limitations have become increasingly apparent. Greater
territorial polarization and pervasive left-behindedness
have underscored the need for a more inclusive territorial
development approach, prompting increased interest in
understanding and addressing regional disparities to ensure
more equitable economic growth. This paper synthesizes the
growing interest in territorial development, which has
driven the adoption of what are increasingly place-based and
place-sensitive approaches to development. The paper also
emphasizes the need for complementarity between
efficiency-driven and equity-focused interventions, while
highlighting emerging topics in regional economics research,
including the role of institutions, agency, and external
megatrends such as the green transition. The paper concludes
by advocating a place-sensitive approach that tailors
policies to regional challenges, promoting economic
potential, diversification, and inclusivity across all regions. |
---|