What Are the Poverty and Inequality Impacts of Fiscal Policy in Turkey?
Fiscal policy is central to not only macroeconomic stability and growth, but also to poverty and inequality reduction. This paper provides the most comprehensive assessment of the distributional incidence of Turkey’s fiscal policy to date. It analyzes the combined and individual incidence of direct...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Fiscal policy is central to not only
macroeconomic stability and growth, but also to poverty and
inequality reduction. This paper provides the most
comprehensive assessment of the distributional incidence of
Turkey’s fiscal policy to date. It analyzes the combined and
individual incidence of direct and indirect taxes,
transfers, and social spending and benchmarks Turkey’s
achievements against peer countries. The results show that
fiscal policy significantly reduces income inequality in
Turkey, driven by social spending on education and health,
and complemented by direct taxes and transfer schemes that
countervail the inequality-increasing impact of indirect
taxes. At the bottom of the income distribution, targeted
transfers are insufficient to compensate for the effect of
taxes, resulting in net increases in poverty. In the context
of upper-middle-income countries, Turkey’s performance is
below the median. This is driven by the relatively larger
negative impacts of indirect taxes and the more limited
positive impacts of direct transfers and taxes. From a
policy perspective, the paper contributes to identifying
entry points for improving the equity impact of the fiscal
package. Among these, targeting the minimum subsistence
allowance (AGI) program toward the poor could be an
efficient way forward. More broadly, the study represents a
platform to simulate the distributional implications of a
variety of fiscal changes to inform stakeholders and the
policy debate. |
---|