Zambia Health Sector Public Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery Survey
Zambia’s health sector has continued to evolve with the government undertaking several reforms aimed at improving the performance of the sector to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their precursor, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Amid the ongoing reforms, the health secto...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Zambia’s health sector has continued to
evolve with the government undertaking several reforms aimed
at improving the performance of the sector to achieve the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their precursor,
the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Amid the ongoing
reforms, the health sector has recorded a number of
achievements, but some challenges remain. This Public
Expenditure Tracking and Quantitative Service Delivery
Survey (PET-QSDS) assesses the financing and delivery of
health services, and whether the reform objectives have been
made. This was achieved by reviewing the flow of financial
and other resources in the public health sector from
administrative units to service delivery points at the
facility level. The data were collected from administrative
units, health workers, and patients to gauge the various
dimensions of the health system that include financial
flows, management of infrastructure, human resources for
health, and patient management. Specifically, the issues
which were reviewed are: Availability, adequacy, and
timeliness of resources for service delivery; implementation
of some key policy reforms such as user fee removal and
adherence to policy guidelines; donor resource coordination,
ownership, and fragmentation at the district level;
assessment of human resources management at the district and
facility levels; and comparison of staff satisfaction,
absenteeism, and service delivery in districts implementing
the Results-based Financing (RBF) model and non-RBF districts. |
---|