On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly
Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Production and operations management 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4089 |
container_title | Production and operations management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Clottey, Toyin Benton, W. C. |
description | Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control.
Author Video |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/poms.13503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_poms_13503_POMS13503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_poms.13503</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2600248066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EElDY8AWWWCCBAnac5xLKqxKoleg-cpxJMUrsYqdAd3wC38iXMKUFNgjhjV_nzsy9hOxxdsxxnUxt64-5iJlYI1s8F2kQ53GyjmcW5wGP0myTbHv_wBhLRci2SDM09O5eOm0mdCRdR891C8ZrazwdmNq6VnZ4odJUdNDhWzuVqqP4cg5eTwwd2wacNAoWPL3UL1C9v76daSwLDahOPwE99R7aspnvkI1aNh52V3uPjC8vxv3r4GZ4Neif3gRKJIkIkijkEVdhklYyTAGYSOMqUmXO65KJsuZJpWL8z-oM4iqTgOZSKTNRlTmCokf2l2Wnzj7OwHfFg505gx2LMGEsjDKGbXrkcEkpZ713UBdTp1vp5gVnxSLMYhFm8RkmwkdL-BlKW3ulAR1_CzDNJI14GGN1xjjS2f_pvu4-I-7bmelQyldS3cD8j5GK0fD27mu4g6XGywn8eP3FxgfPi6Wd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600248066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control.
Author Video</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/poms.13503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bayesian modeling ; Engineering ; Engineering, Manufacturing ; matchable degree ; Operations Research & Management Science ; Science & Technology ; selective assembly ; shared information about part dimensions ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Production and operations management, 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 Production and Operations Management Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>4</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000674125600001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7517-4628 ; 0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/poms.13503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/poms.13503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,21826,27931,27932,39265,43628,43629,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><title>Production and operations management</title><addtitle>PROD OPER MANAG</addtitle><description>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control.
Author Video</description><subject>Bayesian modeling</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Manufacturing</subject><subject>matchable degree</subject><subject>Operations Research & Management Science</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>selective assembly</subject><subject>shared information about part dimensions</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1059-1478</issn><issn>1937-5956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EElDY8AWWWCCBAnac5xLKqxKoleg-cpxJMUrsYqdAd3wC38iXMKUFNgjhjV_nzsy9hOxxdsxxnUxt64-5iJlYI1s8F2kQ53GyjmcW5wGP0myTbHv_wBhLRci2SDM09O5eOm0mdCRdR891C8ZrazwdmNq6VnZ4odJUdNDhWzuVqqP4cg5eTwwd2wacNAoWPL3UL1C9v76daSwLDahOPwE99R7aspnvkI1aNh52V3uPjC8vxv3r4GZ4Neif3gRKJIkIkijkEVdhklYyTAGYSOMqUmXO65KJsuZJpWL8z-oM4iqTgOZSKTNRlTmCokf2l2Wnzj7OwHfFg505gx2LMGEsjDKGbXrkcEkpZ713UBdTp1vp5gVnxSLMYhFm8RkmwkdL-BlKW3ulAR1_CzDNJI14GGN1xjjS2f_pvu4-I-7bmelQyldS3cD8j5GK0fD27mu4g6XGywn8eP3FxgfPi6Wd</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Clottey, Toyin</creator><creator>Benton, W. C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-4628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><author>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bayesian modeling</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Manufacturing</topic><topic>matchable degree</topic><topic>Operations Research & Management Science</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>selective assembly</topic><topic>shared information about part dimensions</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clottey, Toyin</au><au>Benton, W. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</atitle><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle><stitle>PROD OPER MANAG</stitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4089</spage><epage>4104</epage><pages>4089-4104</pages><issn>1059-1478</issn><eissn>1937-5956</eissn><abstract>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control.
Author Video</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1111/poms.13503</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-4628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-1478 |
ispartof | Production and operations management, 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104 |
issn | 1059-1478 1937-5956 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_poms_13503_POMS13503 |
source | Access via SAGE; Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Bayesian modeling Engineering Engineering, Manufacturing matchable degree Operations Research & Management Science Science & Technology selective assembly shared information about part dimensions Technology |
title | On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Sharing%20Part%20Dimensions%20Information%20and%20Its%20Impact%20on%20Design%20Tolerances%20In%20Fixed%E2%80%90Bin%20Selective%20Assembly&rft.jtitle=Production%20and%20operations%20management&rft.au=Clottey,%20Toyin&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4089&rft.epage=4104&rft.pages=4089-4104&rft.issn=1059-1478&rft.eissn=1937-5956&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/poms.13503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2600248066%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600248066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_poms.13503&rfr_iscdi=true |