On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly

Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Production and operations management 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104
Hauptverfasser: Clottey, Toyin, Benton, W. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4104
container_issue 11
container_start_page 4089
container_title Production and operations management
container_volume 30
creator Clottey, Toyin
Benton, W. C.
description Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control. Author Video
doi_str_mv 10.1111/poms.13503
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_poms_13503_POMS13503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1111_poms.13503</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2600248066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EElDY8AWWWCCBAnac5xLKqxKoleg-cpxJMUrsYqdAd3wC38iXMKUFNgjhjV_nzsy9hOxxdsxxnUxt64-5iJlYI1s8F2kQ53GyjmcW5wGP0myTbHv_wBhLRci2SDM09O5eOm0mdCRdR891C8ZrazwdmNq6VnZ4odJUdNDhWzuVqqP4cg5eTwwd2wacNAoWPL3UL1C9v76daSwLDahOPwE99R7aspnvkI1aNh52V3uPjC8vxv3r4GZ4Neif3gRKJIkIkijkEVdhklYyTAGYSOMqUmXO65KJsuZJpWL8z-oM4iqTgOZSKTNRlTmCokf2l2Wnzj7OwHfFg505gx2LMGEsjDKGbXrkcEkpZ713UBdTp1vp5gVnxSLMYhFm8RkmwkdL-BlKW3ulAR1_CzDNJI14GGN1xjjS2f_pvu4-I-7bmelQyldS3cD8j5GK0fD27mu4g6XGywn8eP3FxgfPi6Wd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600248066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control. Author Video</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-1478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/poms.13503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bayesian modeling ; Engineering ; Engineering, Manufacturing ; matchable degree ; Operations Research &amp; Management Science ; Science &amp; Technology ; selective assembly ; shared information about part dimensions ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Production and operations management, 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 Production and Operations Management Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>4</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000674125600001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7517-4628 ; 0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/poms.13503$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/poms.13503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,21826,27931,27932,39265,43628,43629,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><title>Production and operations management</title><addtitle>PROD OPER MANAG</addtitle><description>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control. Author Video</description><subject>Bayesian modeling</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Manufacturing</subject><subject>matchable degree</subject><subject>Operations Research &amp; Management Science</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>selective assembly</subject><subject>shared information about part dimensions</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>1059-1478</issn><issn>1937-5956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EElDY8AWWWCCBAnac5xLKqxKoleg-cpxJMUrsYqdAd3wC38iXMKUFNgjhjV_nzsy9hOxxdsxxnUxt64-5iJlYI1s8F2kQ53GyjmcW5wGP0myTbHv_wBhLRci2SDM09O5eOm0mdCRdR891C8ZrazwdmNq6VnZ4odJUdNDhWzuVqqP4cg5eTwwd2wacNAoWPL3UL1C9v76daSwLDahOPwE99R7aspnvkI1aNh52V3uPjC8vxv3r4GZ4Neif3gRKJIkIkijkEVdhklYyTAGYSOMqUmXO65KJsuZJpWL8z-oM4iqTgOZSKTNRlTmCokf2l2Wnzj7OwHfFg505gx2LMGEsjDKGbXrkcEkpZ713UBdTp1vp5gVnxSLMYhFm8RkmwkdL-BlKW3ulAR1_CzDNJI14GGN1xjjS2f_pvu4-I-7bmelQyldS3cD8j5GK0fD27mu4g6XGywn8eP3FxgfPi6Wd</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Clottey, Toyin</creator><creator>Benton, W. C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-4628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</title><author>Clottey, Toyin ; Benton, W. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3663-642141c267da27ee0375d4cb91fb03bf16dc51c28f8e5d8ae1057aa83db95d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bayesian modeling</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Manufacturing</topic><topic>matchable degree</topic><topic>Operations Research &amp; Management Science</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>selective assembly</topic><topic>shared information about part dimensions</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clottey, Toyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benton, W. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clottey, Toyin</au><au>Benton, W. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly</atitle><jtitle>Production and operations management</jtitle><stitle>PROD OPER MANAG</stitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4089</spage><epage>4104</epage><pages>4089-4104</pages><issn>1059-1478</issn><eissn>1937-5956</eissn><abstract>Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control. Author Video</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1111/poms.13503</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7517-4628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-4880</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-1478
ispartof Production and operations management, 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104
issn 1059-1478
1937-5956
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_primary_10_1111_poms_13503_POMS13503
source Access via SAGE; Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Bayesian modeling
Engineering
Engineering, Manufacturing
matchable degree
Operations Research & Management Science
Science & Technology
selective assembly
shared information about part dimensions
Technology
title On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A38%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Sharing%20Part%20Dimensions%20Information%20and%20Its%20Impact%20on%20Design%20Tolerances%20In%20Fixed%E2%80%90Bin%20Selective%20Assembly&rft.jtitle=Production%20and%20operations%20management&rft.au=Clottey,%20Toyin&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4089&rft.epage=4104&rft.pages=4089-4104&rft.issn=1059-1478&rft.eissn=1937-5956&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/poms.13503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2600248066%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600248066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1111_poms.13503&rfr_iscdi=true