On Sharing Part Dimensions Information and Its Impact on Design Tolerances In Fixed‐Bin Selective Assembly

Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Production and operations management 2021-11, Vol.30 (11), p.4089-4104
Hauptverfasser: Clottey, Toyin, Benton, W. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Fixed‐bin selective assembly (FBSA) is a method for producing high‐tolerance specification assembly from lower precision components. This study investigates the design tolerance implications of an external supplier sharing dimensional information about shipped parts to be used for FBSA. An approach for reducing surplus components in FBSA is to predictively adjust the assembler's manufacturing process so that components produced internally better match those of incoming parts. However, it is unclear how the assembler's use of timely dimensions information—that is fully shared or is shared for a limited period, about the mean, variance, or both—of an externally sourced mating part would influence procedures for setting tolerances in an FBSA context. We develop and evaluate a Bayesian prediction‐based model with estimated parameters from a US assembler of bearings. Our results indicate that adjustments made using predictions from solely historical data produced comparable assembly efficiency to those made with shared information about only the dimensional variance of incoming parts. Prediction‐based adjustments, when only information about the dimensional mean was shared, yielded comparable matchable degrees to that when the mean and variance were both known. Furthermore, contrary to convention, looser tolerances were required to increase selective assembly efficiency. The shared information had a larger effect on the matchable degree than the modification of design tolerances in the absence of such information sharing. The insights have implications for coordinated component design and quality control. Author Video
ISSN:1059-1478
1937-5956
DOI:10.1111/poms.13503