A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of treating patients with type 2 diabetes and highly elevated HbA1c levels with basal‐bolus insulin or a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist plus basal‐bolus insulin: The SIMPLE study

Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA) plus basal insulin versus basal‐bolus insulin treatment in patients with very uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods The SIMPLE study was a 6‐month pragmatic, randomized, open‐label trial testi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2019-09, Vol.21 (9), p.2133-2141
Hauptverfasser: Abreu, Marconi, Tumyan, Anna, Elhassan, Ahmed, Peicher, Katherine, Papacostea, Olivia, Dimachkie, Perihan, Siddiqui, Muhammad S., Pop, Laurentiu M., Gunasekaran, Uma, Meneghini, Luigi F., Adams‐Huet, Beverley, Li, Xilong, Lingvay, Ildiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA) plus basal insulin versus basal‐bolus insulin treatment in patients with very uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods The SIMPLE study was a 6‐month pragmatic, randomized, open‐label trial testing the effectiveness of two approaches to treat patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥10%. We randomized patients to detemir plus liraglutide or detemir plus aspart (before each meal). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c; changes in body weight, insulin dose, hypoglycaemia and diabetes‐related quality‐of‐life were secondary outcomes. Results We randomized 120 participants aged 47.4 ± 9.5 years, Hispanic 40%, African American 42%, diabetes duration 10 [25th‐75th percentile (6 to 15)] years, body mass index 37.2 ± 10.3 kg/m2. HbA1c decreased more with GLP1RA plus basal insulin [12.2% (95% CI 11.8% to 12.6%) to 8.1% (95% CI 7.4% to 8.7%)] compared with basal‐bolus insulin [11.8% (95% CI 11.5% to 12.2%) to 8.8% (95% CI 88.1% to 9.55%)]; estimated treatment difference (ETD) of −1.1% (95% CI −2.0% to −0.1%) (non‐inferiority margin 0.4% and P = .0001, superiority P = .026). Compared with basal‐bolus insulin, treatment with GLP1RA plus basal insulin led to a body weight ETD of −3.7 kg (95% CI −5.8 to −1.5; P = .001), fewer patients experiencing hypoglycaemia [66.1% vs 35.2% (P = .002)], and greater improvements in general/current health perception, treatment satisfaction, and fear of hypoglycaemia, while taking a lower total daily dose of insulin [estimated treatment ratio 0.68 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.84)]. Conclusions In patients with HbA1c ≥10% treatment with GLP1RA plus basal insulin, compared with basal‐bolus insulin, resulted in better glycaemic control and body weight, lower insulin dosage and hypoglycaemia, and improved quality of life. This treatment strategy is an effective and safe alternative to a basal‐bolus insulin regimen.
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13794