Coeliac Disease Diagnosis

ABSTRACT Background and Objectives: A revision of criteria for diagnosing coeliac disease (CD) is being conducted by The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). In parallel, we have performed a survey aimed to evaluate present practices for CD among paed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2012-01, Vol.54 (1), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Ribes‐Koninckx, C., Mearin, ML, Korponay‐Szabó, IR, Shamir, R., Husby, S., Ventura, A., Branski, D., Catassi, C., Koletzko, S., Mäki, M., Troncone, R., Zimmer, KP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background and Objectives: A revision of criteria for diagnosing coeliac disease (CD) is being conducted by The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). In parallel, we have performed a survey aimed to evaluate present practices for CD among paediatric gastroenterologists and to learn their views on the need for modification of present criteria for CD diagnosis. Patients and Methods: Questionnaires were distributed to experienced paediatric gastroenterologists (ESPGHAN members) via the Internet. Results: Overall, 95 valid questionnaires were available for analysis, pertaining to 28 different countries, with the majority of responders treating patients with CD for >15 years. Only about 12% of the responders comply with present criteria, noncompliance being related mainly to the challenge policy. Approximately 90% request a revision and modification of the present criteria. Forty‐four percent want to omit the small bowel biopsy in symptomatic children with positive anti‐tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin (Ig) A or endomysial IgA antibodies, especially if they are DQ2/DQ8 positive. For silent cases detected by screening with convincingly positive anti‐tissue transglutaminase IgA or EMA IgA, about 30% consider that no small bowel biopsy should be required in selected cases. Adding human leukocyte antigen typing in the diagnostic workup was asked for by 42% of the responders. As for gluten challenge, a new policy is advocated restricting its obligation to cases whenever the diagnosis is doubtful or unclear. Conclusions: Based on these opinions, revision of the ESPGHAN criteria for diagnosing CD is urgently needed.
ISSN:0277-2116
1536-4801
DOI:10.1097/MPG.0b013e31822a00bb