Sensitivities in Satellite Lidar‐Derived Estimates of Daytime Top‐of‐the‐Atmosphere Optically Thin Cirrus Cloud Radiative Forcing: A Case Study

An optically thin cirrus cloud was profiled concurrently with nadir‐pointing 1,064 nm lidars on 11 August 2017 over eastern Texas, including NASA's airborne Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) and space‐borne Clouds and Aerosol Transport System (CATS) instruments. Despite resolving fewer (37% vs. 94%) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2020-09, Vol.47 (17), p.n/a, Article 2020
Hauptverfasser: Dolinar, Erica K., Campbell, James R, Lolli, Simone, Ozog, Scott C., Yorks, John E, Camacho, Christopher, Gu, Yu, Bucholtz, Anthony, Mcgill, Matthew J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An optically thin cirrus cloud was profiled concurrently with nadir‐pointing 1,064 nm lidars on 11 August 2017 over eastern Texas, including NASA's airborne Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) and space‐borne Clouds and Aerosol Transport System (CATS) instruments. Despite resolving fewer (37% vs. 94%) and denser (i.e., more emissive) clouds (average cloud optical depth of 0.10 vs. 0.03, respectively), CATS data render a near‐equal estimate of the top‐of‐atmosphere (TOA) net cloud radiative forcing (CRF) versus CPL. The sample‐relative TOA net CRF solved from CPL is 1.39 W/m2, which becomes 1.32 W/m2 after normalizing by occurrence frequency. Since CATS overestimates extinction for this case, the sample‐relative TOA net forcing is ~3.0 W/m2 larger than CPL, with the absolute value reduced to within 0.3 W/m2 of CPL due its underestimation of cloud occurrence. We discuss the ramifications of thin cirrus cloud detectability from satellite and its impact on attempts at TOA CRF closure.
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/2020GL088871