Gender-based evaluation of the XIENCE V™ everolimus-eluting coronary stent system
Objectives: We evaluated the role of gender on clinical and angiographic results of the everolimus‐eluting stent in the SPIRIT III trial. Background: The SPIRIT III trial demonstrated superior efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus‐eluting stent compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel‐eluting stent. Whether...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2009-11, Vol.74 (5), p.719-727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives:
We evaluated the role of gender on clinical and angiographic results of the everolimus‐eluting stent in the SPIRIT III trial.
Background:
The SPIRIT III trial demonstrated superior efficacy of the XIENCE V everolimus‐eluting stent compared with the TAXUS paclitaxel‐eluting stent. Whether these results are applicable to women is unknown.
Methods:
A total of 1,002 patients with coronary artery lesions of 28 mm or less long in 2.5–3.75 mm diameter vessels were prospectively randomized to receive percutaneous coronary intervention with either XIENCE V stent or TAXUS stent placement. Post hoc gender subset analysis was performed.
Results:
A total of 669 patients (200 women) received the XIENCE V stent, and 332 patients (114 women) were assigned to the TAXUS stent. Women were older and had more hypertension and diabetes than men. At 1 year, rates of MACE (11.1% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.004), TVF (13.7% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.003), TVR (10.8% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.0007), and TLR (7.2% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.002) were higher in women compared with men. The difference in 1 year MACE and TVF rates between men and women remained after adjusting for baseline covariates. Although the angiographic characteristics at baseline were similar among the female cohort, women assigned to XIENCE V had lower in‐stent late loss (0.19 vs. 0.42 mm, P = 0.01) compared with women treated with the TAXUS stent. Although 30‐day clinical outcomes were similar for women treated with XIENCE V and TAXUS stents, at 1 year, women with XIENCE V stents had significantly lower MACE (8.2% vs. 16.1 %, P = 0.04) and TVR (3.1% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.03) compared with those treated with TAXUS stents. Stent thrombosis rates were similar between women receiving either XIENCE V or TAXUS stents.
Conclusions:
Women in the SPIRIT III trial had inherently higher MACE and TVF rates than men. However, the angiographic and clinical benefits of using XIENCE V stents are generalizable to women. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.22067 |