Implementation Issues

This chapter highlights several issues that may encounter on implementing scorecard system and discusses how to ensure a successful implementation. It is important to have a realistic time frame for implementing scorecard system. Having a deadline for implementation was found to be effective in ensu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue
container_start_page 97
container_title
container_volume
description This chapter highlights several issues that may encounter on implementing scorecard system and discusses how to ensure a successful implementation. It is important to have a realistic time frame for implementing scorecard system. Having a deadline for implementation was found to be effective in ensuring that the scorecard system is completed in a timely manner; without a deadline, projects may seem to go on forever. There are various approaches that can be taken in scorecard implementation, including the top‐down, bottom‐up, and pilot project. The SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study indicated that implementations using a pilot project approach are most likely to be implemented quickly. This makes sense, as these projects have a limited scope and can be completed in a short time frame. Organizations that use a bottom‐up approach and are implemented for operational management purposes are also completed relatively quickly. Systems that are implemented using a top‐down approach, especially those implemented down to the departmental level, tend to take the longest time to implement.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/9781119197799.ch8
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch8_ch8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1002/9781119197799.ch8</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch8_ch83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDAw0rc0tzA0NLQ0tDQ3t7TUS86wYGTgRRFjZuAyMDE3MDSyNDGz4GDgLS7OMgABc3MLM0tOBlHP3IKc1NzUvJLEksz8PAXP4uLS1GIeBta0xJziVF4ozc1g6OYa4uyhW56Zk1oZn5qUn59dHG9oEA9yQzyKffFAN4CwMXl6dLHoQVVblVkAVl-QkmYMAOYpRxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Enrichment Source</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Implementation Issues</title><source>O'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition</source><contributor>Hatch, Toby ; Desroches, Denis ; Lawson, Raef</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hatch, Toby ; Desroches, Denis ; Lawson, Raef</creatorcontrib><description>This chapter highlights several issues that may encounter on implementing scorecard system and discusses how to ensure a successful implementation. It is important to have a realistic time frame for implementing scorecard system. Having a deadline for implementation was found to be effective in ensuring that the scorecard system is completed in a timely manner; without a deadline, projects may seem to go on forever. There are various approaches that can be taken in scorecard implementation, including the top‐down, bottom‐up, and pilot project. The SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study indicated that implementations using a pilot project approach are most likely to be implemented quickly. This makes sense, as these projects have a limited scope and can be completed in a short time frame. Organizations that use a bottom‐up approach and are implemented for operational management purposes are also completed relatively quickly. Systems that are implemented using a top‐down approach, especially those implemented down to the departmental level, tend to take the longest time to implement.</description><identifier>ISBN: 0470129468</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780470129463</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781119197799</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1119197791</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/9781119197799.ch8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>bottom‐up ; implementation ; pilot project ; scorecard system ; time frame ; top‐down</subject><ispartof>Scorecard Best Practices, 2012, p.97-112</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>779,780,784,793,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hatch, Toby</contributor><contributor>Desroches, Denis</contributor><contributor>Lawson, Raef</contributor><title>Implementation Issues</title><title>Scorecard Best Practices</title><description>This chapter highlights several issues that may encounter on implementing scorecard system and discusses how to ensure a successful implementation. It is important to have a realistic time frame for implementing scorecard system. Having a deadline for implementation was found to be effective in ensuring that the scorecard system is completed in a timely manner; without a deadline, projects may seem to go on forever. There are various approaches that can be taken in scorecard implementation, including the top‐down, bottom‐up, and pilot project. The SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study indicated that implementations using a pilot project approach are most likely to be implemented quickly. This makes sense, as these projects have a limited scope and can be completed in a short time frame. Organizations that use a bottom‐up approach and are implemented for operational management purposes are also completed relatively quickly. Systems that are implemented using a top‐down approach, especially those implemented down to the departmental level, tend to take the longest time to implement.</description><subject>bottom‐up</subject><subject>implementation</subject><subject>pilot project</subject><subject>scorecard system</subject><subject>time frame</subject><subject>top‐down</subject><isbn>0470129468</isbn><isbn>9780470129463</isbn><isbn>9781119197799</isbn><isbn>1119197791</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNDAw0rc0tzA0NLQ0tDQ3t7TUS86wYGTgRRFjZuAyMDE3MDSyNDGz4GDgLS7OMgABc3MLM0tOBlHP3IKc1NzUvJLEksz8PAXP4uLS1GIeBta0xJziVF4ozc1g6OYa4uyhW56Zk1oZn5qUn59dHG9oEA9yQzyKffFAN4CwMXl6dLHoQVVblVkAVl-QkmYMAOYpRxE</recordid><startdate>20120102</startdate><enddate>20120102</enddate><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20120102</creationdate><title>Implementation Issues</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch8_ch83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>bottom‐up</topic><topic>implementation</topic><topic>pilot project</topic><topic>scorecard system</topic><topic>time frame</topic><topic>top‐down</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch, Toby</au><au>Desroches, Denis</au><au>Lawson, Raef</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Implementation Issues</atitle><btitle>Scorecard Best Practices</btitle><date>2012-01-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><spage>97</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>97-112</pages><isbn>0470129468</isbn><isbn>9780470129463</isbn><eisbn>9781119197799</eisbn><eisbn>1119197791</eisbn><abstract>This chapter highlights several issues that may encounter on implementing scorecard system and discusses how to ensure a successful implementation. It is important to have a realistic time frame for implementing scorecard system. Having a deadline for implementation was found to be effective in ensuring that the scorecard system is completed in a timely manner; without a deadline, projects may seem to go on forever. There are various approaches that can be taken in scorecard implementation, including the top‐down, bottom‐up, and pilot project. The SHAPs (i.e., SUNY, Hyperion, and Pepperdine scorecard) study indicated that implementations using a pilot project approach are most likely to be implemented quickly. This makes sense, as these projects have a limited scope and can be completed in a short time frame. Organizations that use a bottom‐up approach and are implemented for operational management purposes are also completed relatively quickly. Systems that are implemented using a top‐down approach, especially those implemented down to the departmental level, tend to take the longest time to implement.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/9781119197799.ch8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 0470129468
ispartof Scorecard Best Practices, 2012, p.97-112
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_wiley_ebooks_10_1002_9781119197799_ch8_ch8
source O'Reilly Online Learning: Academic/Public Library Edition
subjects bottom‐up
implementation
pilot project
scorecard system
time frame
top‐down
title Implementation Issues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T21%3A40%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Implementation%20Issues&rft.btitle=Scorecard%20Best%20Practices&rft.au=Hatch,%20Toby&rft.date=2012-01-02&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=97-112&rft.isbn=0470129468&rft.isbn_list=9780470129463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/9781119197799.ch8&rft_dat=%3Cwiley%3E10.1002/9781119197799.ch8%3C/wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781119197799&rft.eisbn_list=1119197791&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true