Tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: improving the value of modern staging - a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements made in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease, staging has not been refined. The role of tumor deposits (TD) in staging remains under debate. We have assessed the relation of TD with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nagtegaal, ID, Knijn, N, Hugen, N, Marshall, HC, Sugihara, K, Tot, T, Ueno, H, Quirke, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements made in the treatment of various types of metastatic disease, staging has not been refined. The role of tumor deposits (TD) in staging remains under debate. We have assessed the relation of TD with metastatic pattern, to evaluate whether TD might add significant new information to staging. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search focused on the role of TD in CRC. Studies with neoadjuvant treated patients were excluded. Data on stage, histological factors and outcome were extracted. Data from four large cohorts were analyzed for the relevance of the presence of TD, lymph node metastases (LNM) and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) on the pattern of metastases and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 10,106 included CRC patients 22% presented with TD. TD are invariably associated with poor outcome. The presence of TD was associated with the presence of LNM and EMVI. In a pair wise comparison, the effects of TD were stronger than both LNM and EMVI. In the logistic regression model, TD in combination with LNM is the strongest predictor for liver (odds ratio (OR) 5.5), lung (OR 4.3) and peritoneal metastases (OR 7.0). The presence of EMVI adds information for liver and lung metastases, but not for peritoneal metastases. CONCLUSION: We have shown that TD are not equal to LNM or EMVI, with respect to biology and outcome. We lose valuable prognostic information by allocating TD into nodal category N1c and only considering TD in the absence of LNM. Therefore, we propose that the number of TD should be added to the number of LNM to derive a final N stage.
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.9091