Neuropsychological studies in families with fragile-X negative X-linked mental retardation

Neuropsychological studies were performed in 82 subjects of 12 families with X‐linked, fragile X negative, mental retardation (MR). Subjects were examined with Wechsler tests (WPPSI, WISC‐R or WAIS, according to their capabilities), Progressive Matrices, Bender or Santucci and memory tests. Physical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of medical genetics 1992-04, Vol.43 (1-2), p.505-509
Hauptverfasser: Cianchetti, Carlo, Sannio-Fancello, Giuseppina, Fratta, Anna-Lisa, Pischedda, Maria-Paola, Spinicci, Gabriella, Marrosu, Maria-Giovanna, Filippi, Giorgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Neuropsychological studies were performed in 82 subjects of 12 families with X‐linked, fragile X negative, mental retardation (MR). Subjects were examined with Wechsler tests (WPPSI, WISC‐R or WAIS, according to their capabilities), Progressive Matrices, Bender or Santucci and memory tests. Physical findings in 5 families were characterised by micro‐orchidism (MiO), microcephaly (MiC), short stature (SS) and non‐specific facial features (XMR±MiO±MiC±SS). The 11 males with MR had a very low IQ, ranging from 13 to 37 (mean 21.2±8.8); this did not constitute a profile definition. Among the females of their families, 4 had subnormal or borderline IQ, respectively 74, 66, 38 and 37. A second group (2 families) had MiO but with normal stature and occipito‐frontal circumference (XMR±MiO). The 7 males with MR had an IQ ranging from 24 to 43 (mean 35.1±5.8) and showed frequently better results in performance than in verbal subtests. In these 2 families, 5 females had subnormal or borderline IQ, respectively 77, 72, 71, 70 and 20. In the 5 families of the third group, XMR±MaO(fraX‐), several affected males had macro‐orchidism (MaO) and facial changes similar to those of fragile X syndrome. IQ variability, also in the same family (e.g.: the 3 brothers of family 3 had, respectively, an IQ of 26, 28 and 68; the 2 brothers of family 1 had an IQ of 13 and 63) and different profiles. Two females were severely affected (IQ 16 and 24), while another 4 had an IQ, respectively, of 63, 69, 71 and 72.
ISSN:0148-7299
1096-8628
DOI:10.1002/ajmg.1320430175