Analyzing the Estrogen Receptor Status of Liver Metastases with [F-18]-FES-PET in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16 alpha-[F-18]-fluoro-17 beta-estradiol ([F-18]-FES) can visualize estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but it is challenging to determine the ER status of liver metastases, due to high physiological [F-18]-FES uptake. We evaluated whether [F-18]-FE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostics (Basel) 2021-10, Vol.11 (11), p.2019, Article 2019
Hauptverfasser: Boers, Jorianne, Loudini, Naila, de Haas, Robbert J., Willemsen, Antoon T. M., van der Vegt, Bert, de Vries, Elisabeth G. E., Hospers, Geke A. P., Schroder, Carolina P., Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M., de Vries, Erik F. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16 alpha-[F-18]-fluoro-17 beta-estradiol ([F-18]-FES) can visualize estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but it is challenging to determine the ER status of liver metastases, due to high physiological [F-18]-FES uptake. We evaluated whether [F-18]-FES-PET can be used to determine the ER status of liver metastases, using corresponding liver biopsies as the gold standard. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 23) were included if they had undergone a [F-18]-FES-PET, liver metastasis biopsy, CT-scan, and [F-18]-FDG-PET. [F-18]-FES-PET scans were assessed by visual and quantitative analysis, tracer uptake was correlated with ER expression measured by immunohistochemical staining and the effects of region-of-interest size and background correction were determined. Results: Visual analysis allowed ER assessment of liver metastases with 100% specificity and 18% sensitivity. Quantitative analysis improved the sensitivity. Reduction of the region-of-interest size did not further improve the results, but background correction improved ER assessment, resulting in 83% specificity and 77% sensitivity. Using separate thresholds for ER+ and ER- metastases, positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 75%, respectively, could be obtained, although 30% of metastases remained inconclusive. Conclusion: In the majority of liver metastases, ER status can be determined with [F-18]-FES-PET if background correction and separate thresholds are applied.
ISSN:2075-4418
2075-4418
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics11112019