Parametric analysis and multi-objective optimization of a combined Organic Rankine Cycle and Vapor Compression Cycle
[Display omitted] •Thermo-economic analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle driven Vapor Compressor Cycle is presented.•Energy and exergy efficiencies and LCOE are selected as conflicting objectives.•Multi-objective optimization is conducted to reveal the optimal design.•A sensitivity analysis is carrie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainable energy technologies and assessments 2021-10, Vol.47, p.101401, Article 101401 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Thermo-economic analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle driven Vapor Compressor Cycle is presented.•Energy and exergy efficiencies and LCOE are selected as conflicting objectives.•Multi-objective optimization is conducted to reveal the optimal design.•A sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the system performance.•Potential applications of co/tri-generation system are presented.
This paper aims to provide a performance examination of combining power and refrigeration system, which consists of an Organic Rankine Cycle driven Vapor Compression Cycle from waste heat source. The following working fluids R123, R11, and R113 were assessed from thermodynamic and economic standpoints. The numerical model of the system is developed under Engineering Equation Solver software. Thermal and exergy efficiencies of the combined system are selected to establish the thermodynamic analysis. The economic evaluation was based on three indicators, namely net earnings, payback period, and levelized cost of energy. In order to examine the trade-off between thermodynamic and economic performance, a multi-objective optimization supported by a decision-making process is investigated. Moreover, a parametric study is carried out to determine the effect of several parameters such as boiler and condenser temperatures and mass flow rate on the system performance. The optimized results indicate that the highest energy and exergy efficiencies using R123 as working fluid are over 1.02 and 0.53 respectively, while the payback period is 6.3 years. Additionally, the levelized cost of energy is 0.06 $/kWh at heat source temperature of 150 °C, condenser temperature of 25 °C and turbine inlet pressure of 2 MPa. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2213-1388 2213-1396 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101401 |