The impact of transfemoral socket adduction on pelvic and trunk stabilization during level walking – A biomechanical study

•Transfemoral socket adduction contributes to pelvic and upper body stabilization.•An adequate adduction condition reduces shoulder obliquity and lateral trunk lean.•For medium stump length transfemoral socket adduction of 6 ± 1° is recommended. It is common practice to align transfemoral prosthetic sockets in adduction, due to the physiologic, adducted femoral alignment in unimpaired legs. An adducted femoral and socket alignment helps tightening hip abductors to stabilize the pelvis and reduce pelvic and trunk related compensatory movements. How do different socket adduction conditions (SAC) of transfemoral sockets affect pelvic and trunk stabilization during level ground walking in the frontal plane? Seven persons with transfemoral amputation with medium residual limb length participated in this study. The prosthetic alignment in the sagittal plane was performed according to established recommendations. SAC varied (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°). Kinematic and kinetic parameters were recorded in a gait laboratory with a 12-camera optoelectronic system and two piezoelectric force plates embedded in a 12-m walkway. The measurements were performed during level ground walking with self-selected comfortable gait speed. In the frontal plane, nearly all investigated kinematic and kinetic parameters showed a strong correlation with the SAC. The pelvis was raised on the contralateral side throughout the gait cycle with increasing SAC. During the prosthetic side stance phase, the mean shoulder obliquity and mean lateral trunk lean to the prosthetic side tended to be reduced with increased SAC. Prosthetic side hip abduction moment decreased with increasing SAC. The results confirm that transfemoral SAC contributes to pelvic stabilization and reduced compensatory movements of the pelvis and trunk. Transfemoral SAC of 6 ± 1° for bench alignment seems adequate for amputees with medium residual limb length. However, the optimum value for the individual patient may differ slightly.