Removal of rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles from stormwater by a gross pollutant trap - bioretention treatment train
•The removal of microplastics by a stormwater treatment train was evaluated.•There was an abundance of microplastics in the highway runoff.•Rubber and bitumen particles predominated the identified microplastics.•A gross pollutant trap was found to be inefficient at removing microplastics.•Both a veg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2021-09, Vol.202, p.117457-117457, Article 117457 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The removal of microplastics by a stormwater treatment train was evaluated.•There was an abundance of microplastics in the highway runoff.•Rubber and bitumen particles predominated the identified microplastics.•A gross pollutant trap was found to be inefficient at removing microplastics.•Both a vegetated and sand-only filter efficiently removed microplastics.
Microplastic particles in stormwater pose significant threats to the environment. This study investigated how effective a stormwater treatment train was at removing rubber, bitumen and other microplastics (incl. fibers, fragments, and paint particles) in the 100–300 µm and >300 µm size fractions from highway runoff. The two treatment trains comprise a gross pollutant trap (GPT) followed by either a vegetated bioretention cell or non-vegetated sand filter. Flow-proportional composite samples were taken from the highway runoff, GPT outflow and the outflow from the two parallel filters during nine rain events to determine overall treatment performance, as well as the performance of individual system components. The identified rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles mainly represented the 100–300 µm fraction and included high ratios of rubber (30%) and bitumen (60%). Overall, the treatment train efficiently removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles in the 100–300 µm size fraction from the stormwater. The filter cells accounted for a major share of this removal, as the GPT did not reduce microplastic particle concentrations. This observation is likely explained by the fact that the rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles have a density close to the density of water and thus removal by sedimentation is decreased. This identified an inherent weakness of the system; more specifically, the high microplastic concentrations in the surface water of the GPT means there can be a risk of microplastic release through overflow pits when inflows surpass the system capacity. Despite some differences, both the vegetated bioretention cell and the non-vegetated sand filter removed rubber, bitumen and other microplastic particles to similar extent.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117457 |