Quantum Principal Component Analysis Only Achieves an Exponential Speedup Because of Its State Preparation Assumptions

A central roadblock to analyzing quantum algorithms on quantum states is the lack of a comparable input model for classical algorithms. Inspired by recent work of the author [E. Tang, STOC 2019.], we introduce such a model, where we assume we can efficiently perform l(2)-norm samples of input data,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review letters 2021-08, Vol.127 (6), p.060503-060503, Article 060503
1. Verfasser: Tang, Ewin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A central roadblock to analyzing quantum algorithms on quantum states is the lack of a comparable input model for classical algorithms. Inspired by recent work of the author [E. Tang, STOC 2019.], we introduce such a model, where we assume we can efficiently perform l(2)-norm samples of input data, a natural analog to quantum algorithms that assume efficient state preparation of classical data. Though this model produces less practical algorithms than the (stronger) standard model of classical computation, it captures versions of many of the features and nuances of quantum linear algebra algorithms. With this model, we describe classical analogs to Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost's quantum algorithms for principal component analysis [S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014).] and nearest-centroid clustering [S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning]. Since they are only polynomially slower, these algorithms suggest that the exponential speedups of their quantum counterparts are simply an artifact of state preparation assumptions.
ISSN:0031-9007
1079-7114
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.060503