Tree species, crown cover, and age as determinants of the vertical distribution of airborne LiDAR returns
Key message We assessed even-aged stand vertical distributions of LiDAR returns and found that tree species, age, and crown cover each have a distinct pattern that together explains up to 47% of the variation. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides information on the vertical structure of fore...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trees (Berlin, West) West), 2021-12, Vol.35 (6), p.1845-1861 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Key message
We assessed even-aged stand vertical distributions of LiDAR returns and found that tree species, age, and crown cover each have a distinct pattern that together explains up to 47% of the variation.
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides information on the vertical structure of forest stands enabling detailed and extensive ecosystem study. The vertical structure is often summarized by scalar features and data-reduction techniques that limit the interpretation of results. Instead, we quantified the influence of three variables, species, crown cover, and age, on the vertical distribution of airborne LiDAR returns from forest stands. We studied 5428 regular, even-aged stands in Quebec (Canada) with five dominant species: balsam fir [
Abies balsamea
(L.) Mill.], paper birch (
Betula papyrifera
Marsh), black spruce [
Picea mariana
(Mill.) BSP], white spruce (
Picea glauca
Moench) and aspen (
Populus tremuloides
Michx.). We modeled the vertical distribution against the three variables using a functional general linear model and a novel nonparametric graphical test of significance. Results indicate that LiDAR returns from aspen stands had the most uniform vertical distribution. Balsam fir and white birch distributions were similar and centered at around 50% of the stand height, and black spruce and white spruce distributions were skewed to below 30% of stand height (
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-1890 1432-2285 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00468-021-02155-2 |