Surface treatments on CAD/CAM glass–ceramics: Influence on roughness, topography, and bond strength

Objective To evaluate the influence of surface treatment on roughness (SA), topography, and shear bond strength (SBS) of computer‐aided designer and manufacture (CAD/CAM) zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic (FEL) glass–ceramics. Materials and methods FEL and ZLS specimens were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2021-07, Vol.33 (5), p.739-749
Hauptverfasser: Azevedo, Veber Luiz Bomfim, Castro, Eduardo Fernandes, Bonvent, Jean‐Jacques, Andrade, Oswaldo Scopin, Nascimento, Fábio Dupart, Giannini, Marcelo, Cavalli, Vanessa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate the influence of surface treatment on roughness (SA), topography, and shear bond strength (SBS) of computer‐aided designer and manufacture (CAD/CAM) zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) and feldspathic (FEL) glass–ceramics. Materials and methods FEL and ZLS specimens were submitted to 5% or 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) or self‐etching ceramic primer (MEP) and different application times (20, 40, and 60 s), or to sandblasting (Control, 20 s). Resin cement cylinders were bonded to the specimens and tested in shear (n = 10) after 24 h and 16‐months of water storage. SA and topography were evaluated by atomic force (AFM, n = 10) and scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05). Results Sandblasting promoted the highest SA for ZLS, but 10% HF (40, 60 s) promoted higher SBS at 16 months. 10% HF produced the highest SA for FEL, but sandblasting and 5% HF (20 s) maintained SBS after 16 months, without differences from 10% HF (20 s) (p > 0.05). Overall, MEP produced lower SA and SBS among groups (p 
ISSN:1496-4155
1708-8240
DOI:10.1111/jerd.12734