A multiplicative finite strain crystal plasticity formulation based on additive elastic corrector rates: Theory and numerical implementation

The purpose of continuum plasticity models is to efficiently predict the behavior of structures beyond their elastic limits. The purpose of multiscale materials science models, among them crystal plasticity models, is to understand the material behavior and design the material for a given target. The current successful continuum hyperelastoplastic models are based in the multiplicative decomposition from crystal plasticity, but significant differences in the computational frameworks of both approaches remain, making comparisons not straightforward. In previous works we have presented a theory for multiplicative continuum elastoplasticity which solved many long-standing issues, preserving the appealing structure of additive infinitesimal Wilkins algorithms. In this work we extend the theory to crystal plasticity. We show that the new formulation for crystal plasticity is parallel and comparable in structure to continuum plasticity, preserving the attractive aspects of the framework: (1) simplicity of the kinematics resulting in additive strain updates as in the infinitesimal framework; (2) possibility of very large elastic strains and unrestricted type of hyperelastic behavior; (3) immediate plain backward-Euler algorithmic implementation of the continuum theory avoiding algorithmically motivated exponential mappings, yet preserving isochoric flow; (4) absence of Mandel-type stresses in the formulation; (5) objectiveness and weak-invariance by construction due to the use of flow rules in terms of elastic corrector rates. We compare the results of our crystal plasticity formulation with the classical formulation from Kalidindi, Bronkhorst and Anand based on quadratic strains and an exponential mapping update of the plastic deformation gradient. •New crystal plasticity formulation based on elastic corrector rates.•Comparable formulation to the continuum plasticity formulation using the same framework.•Additive structure parallel to infinitesimal plasticity.•Plain backward-Euler integration algorithm without exponential mapping.•Mandel stress plays no role.•Comparison with the classical Kalidindi-Bronkhorst-Anand formulation.