Is Impulse Oscillometry System a Useful Method for the Evaluation and Follow-Up of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis?
Background: Although the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) is a noninvasive, easily accessible, well-tolerated, and alternative test, routine use of IOS in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is not widespread. In our unit, IOS is routinely used for the evaluation and follow-up of patients with CF. We aim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology immunology, and pulmonology, 2021-03, Vol.34 (1), p.15-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Although the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) is a noninvasive, easily accessible, well-tolerated, and alternative test, routine use of IOS in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is not widespread. In our unit, IOS is routinely used for the evaluation and follow-up of patients with CF. We aimed to show that IOS may be utilized as a complement for measuring pulmonary function in CF patients.
Materials and Methods:
Retrospective data collection and analysis of pulmonary function tests on CF patients followed at our center between January 1, 2018 and February 1, 2019. IOS and spirometry data were compared as correlated with patients' clinical exacerbation, treatment response, bronchodilator response, and trends during follow-up intervals.
Results:
There was a significant correlation between spirometry and IOS parameters in 70 patients. In exacerbation, Z5, R5–R10, AX, Fres, and delta R5–R20 were significantly increased and X5–X20 was significantly decreased compared with baseline in 25 patients. After treatment, IOS parameters were observed to return to baseline values. In the evaluation of bronchodilator response in 33 patients, significant changes in IOS (decrease in Z5, R5–R10, AX, Fres, and delta R5–R20, and increase in X5–X10) and in spirometry [increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow during the middle half of forced vital capacity (FEF
25–75
)] were found after bronchodilator. While there was no significant difference between spirometry values in follow-up visits in 31 patients, there was a significant increase in Z5% and R5%–R20%. Unlike other studies, there was a significant correlation between clinical scores and IOS.
Conclusions:
These results show that although IOS is not the gold standard method such as spirometry, it is an alternative method that can be used successfully in the evaluation and follow-up of CF patients. Clinical
Trials.gov
ID: 99166796-050.06.04 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2151-321X 2151-3228 |
DOI: | 10.1089/ped.2020.1317 |