A novel method of donor.recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: A total cardiac volume.predictive model
BACKGROUND: The pediatric heart transplant community uses weight-based donor-to-recipient size matching almost exclusively, despite no evidence to validate weight as a reliable surrogate of cardiac size. Donor size mismatch is the second most common reason for the refusal of donor hearts in current...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of heart and lung transplantation 2021-02, Vol.40 (2), p.158-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND: The pediatric heart transplant community uses weight-based donor-to-recipient size matching almost exclusively, despite no evidence to validate weight as a reliable surrogate of cardiac size. Donor size mismatch is the second most common reason for the refusal of donor hearts in current practice (similar to 30% of all refusals). Whereas case-by-case segmentation of total cardiac volume (TCV) by computed tomography (CT) for direct virtual transplantation is an attractive option, it remains limited by the unavailability of donor chest CT. We sought to establish a predictive model for donor TCV on the basis of anthropomorphic and chest X-ray (CXR) cardiac measures.
METHODS: Banked imaging studies from 141 subjects with normal CT chest angiograms were obtained and segmented using 3-dimensional modeling to derive TCV. CXR data were available for 62 of those subjects. A total of 3 predictive models of TCV were fit through multiple linear regression using the following variables: Model A (weight only); Model B (weight, height, sex, and age); Model C (weight, height, sex, age, and 1-view anteroposterior CXR maximal horizontal cardiac width).
RESULTS: Model C provided the most accurate prediction of TCV (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.99, testing set R-2 = 0.98, mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 8.6%) and outperformed Model A (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.94, testing set R-2 = 0.94, MAPE = 16.1%) and Model B (optimism corrected R-2 = 0.97, testing set R-2 = 0.97, MAPE = 11.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: TCV can be predicted accurately using readily available anthropometrics and a 1-view CXR from donor candidates. This simple and scalable method of TCV estimation may provide a reliable and consistent method to improve donor size matching. (C) 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-2498 1557-3117 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.002 |