Objective quantification of burn scar stiffness using shear-wave elastography: Initial evidence of validity

•Shear-wave elastography is a novel method to quantify adult burn scar stiffness.•Concurrent validity was indicated by high correlations between shear-wave velocity and clinical scar assessment.•Scar velocity varied significantly by time and sex. Females had relatively stiffer scars with time compar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BURNS 2020-12, Vol.46 (8), p.1787-1798
Hauptverfasser: DeJong, Helen, Abbott, Steven, Zelesco, Marilyn, Spilsbury, Katrina, Ziman, Melanie, Kennedy, Brendan F., Martin, Lisa, Wood, Fiona M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Shear-wave elastography is a novel method to quantify adult burn scar stiffness.•Concurrent validity was indicated by high correlations between shear-wave velocity and clinical scar assessment.•Scar velocity varied significantly by time and sex. Females had relatively stiffer scars with time compared to men.•Skin and scar velocity varied significantly by body location and Fitzpatrick Type, but not age. Shear-wave elastography (SWE) is an ultrasound based technology that can provide reliable measurements (velocity) of scar stiffness. The aim of this research was to evaluate the concurrent validity of using both the measured velocity and the calculated difference in velocity between scars and matched controls, in addition to evaluating potential patient factors that may influence the interpretation of the measurements. A cross-sectional study of 32 participants, with 48 burn scars and 48 matched contralateral control sites were evaluated with SWE, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) tactile sub-scores. Spearman’s rho demonstrated high correlations (r > 0.7) between the measured scar velocity and both the POSAS and VSS pliability sub-scores, whereas moderate correlations (r > 0.6) were found with the calculated difference in velocity. Regression analysis indicated that the association of increased velocity in scars, varied by length of time after burn injury and gender. Body location and Fitzpatrick skin type also demonstrated significant associations with velocity, whereas age did not. SWE shows potential as a novel tool to quantify burn scar stiffness, however patient factors need to be considered when interpreting results. Further research is recommended on a larger variety of scars to support the findings.
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.009