Replay attack detection using variable-frequency resolution phase and magnitude features

•F-ratio method was used for anti-spoofing frequency discriminative analysis.•Adaptive frequency resolution features were designed according to frequency discriminative analysis.•A new adaptive frequency resolution Relative Phase feature was proposed.•Three types of adaptive filters were proposed an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer speech & language 2021-03, Vol.66, p.101161, Article 101161
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Meng, Wang, Longbiao, Dang, Jianwu, Lee, Kong Aik, Nakagawa, Seiichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•F-ratio method was used for anti-spoofing frequency discriminative analysis.•Adaptive frequency resolution features were designed according to frequency discriminative analysis.•A new adaptive frequency resolution Relative Phase feature was proposed.•Three types of adaptive filters were proposed and compared for pros and cons.•Complementary information from phase and magnitude were combined in replay detection. Replay attacks pose the most severe threat to automatic speaker verification systems among various spoofing attacks. In this paper, we propose a novel feature extraction method that leverages both the phase-based and magnitude-based features. The proposed method fully utilizes the subband information and the complementary information from the phase and magnitude spectra. First, we conduct a discriminative performance analysis on full frequency bands via the F-ratio method. Then, variable-frequency resolution features are extracted via several techniques to capture highly discriminative information on frequency bands. Finally, complementary information from the phase and magnitude domains are fused to achieve higher performance. The results on the ASVspoof 2017 database demonstrate that our proposed frequency adaptive features attain relative error reduction rates of 83.4% and 62.3% on the development and evaluation datasets, respectively, compared to the baseline method.
ISSN:0885-2308
1095-8363
DOI:10.1016/j.csl.2020.101161