Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With a History of Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial

BACKGROUND:Whether an initial invasive strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia improves outcomes in the setting of a history of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) when ejection fraction is ≥35% but 45%, 28 HF/LVEF 35% to 45%, and 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-11, Vol.142 (18), p.1725-1735
Hauptverfasser: Lopes, Renato D., Alexander, Karen P., Stevens, Susanna R., Reynolds, Harmony R., Stone, Gregg W., Piña, Ileana L., Rockhold, Frank W., Elghamaz, Ahmed, Lopez-Sendon, Jose Luis, Farsky, Pedro S., Chernyavskiy, Alexander M., Diaz, Ariel, Phaneuf, Denis, De Belder, Mark A., Ma, Yi-tong, Guzman, Luis A., Khouri, Michel, Sionis, Alessandro, Hausenloy, Derek J., Doerr, Rolf, Selvanayagam, Joseph B., Maggioni, Aldo Pietro, Hochman, Judith S., Maron, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Whether an initial invasive strategy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia improves outcomes in the setting of a history of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) when ejection fraction is ≥35% but 45%, 28 HF/LVEF 35% to 45%, and 193 LVEF 35% to 45% but no history of HF. HF/LVD was associated with more comorbidities at baseline, particularly previous myocardial infarction, stroke, and hypertension. Compared with patients without HF/LVD, participants with HF/LVD were more likely to experience a primary outcome composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, HF, or resuscitated cardiac arrest (4-year cumulative incidence rate, 22.7% versus 13.8%; cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, 19.7% versus 12.3%; and all-cause death or HF, 15.0% versus 6.9%). Participants with HF/LVD randomized to the invasive versus conservative strategy had a lower rate of the primary outcome (17.2% versus 29.3%; difference in 4-year event rate, −12.1% [95% CI, −22.6 to −1.6%]), whereas those without HF/LVD did not (13.0% versus 14.6%; difference in 4-year event rate, −1.6% [95% CI, −3.8% to 0.7%]; P interaction = 0.055). A similar differential effect was seen for the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality when invasive versus conservative strategy–associated outcomes were analyzed with LVEF as a continuous variable for patients with and without previous HF. CONCLUSIONS:ISCHEMIA participants with stable ischemic heart disease and at least moderate ischemia with a history of HF or LVD were at increased risk for the primary outcome. In the small, high-risk subgroup with HF and LVEF 35% to 45%, an initial invasive approach was associated with better event-free survival. This result should be considered hypothesis-generating. REGISTRATION:URLhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifierNCT01471522.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050304