Race, Metaphor, and Myth in Academic Medicine
If we truly grasp that unlike early pseudoscientific presumption about racial hierarchy, race is in fact a social construct, we understand that differences in outcomes or health between groups should be attributed to differences in how people are differentially treated vis-a-vis structural oppressio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic psychiatry 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.100-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | If we truly grasp that unlike early pseudoscientific presumption about racial hierarchy, race is in fact a social construct, we understand that differences in outcomes or health between groups should be attributed to differences in how people are differentially treated vis-a-vis structural oppression or privilege [2]. [...]emphasis on “historic” under-representation shifts focus away from contemporary practices that drive modern segregation in medical education—how under-represented groups remain under-represented even despite calls for diversity. [...]among other concerns, the naming of URM groups turns attention away from non-URM groups. [...]emphasis on representation alone may distract attention away from other processes |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1042-9670 1545-7230 1545-7230 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40596-020-01331-9 |