Race, Metaphor, and Myth in Academic Medicine

If we truly grasp that unlike early pseudoscientific presumption about racial hierarchy, race is in fact a social construct, we understand that differences in outcomes or health between groups should be attributed to differences in how people are differentially treated vis-a-vis structural oppressio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic psychiatry 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.100-105
Hauptverfasser: Barceló, Nicolás E., Shadravan, Sonya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:If we truly grasp that unlike early pseudoscientific presumption about racial hierarchy, race is in fact a social construct, we understand that differences in outcomes or health between groups should be attributed to differences in how people are differentially treated vis-a-vis structural oppression or privilege [2]. [...]emphasis on “historic” under-representation shifts focus away from contemporary practices that drive modern segregation in medical education—how under-represented groups remain under-represented even despite calls for diversity. [...]among other concerns, the naming of URM groups turns attention away from non-URM groups. [...]emphasis on representation alone may distract attention away from other processes
ISSN:1042-9670
1545-7230
1545-7230
DOI:10.1007/s40596-020-01331-9