Potential value of electronic health records in capturing data on geriatric frailty for population health
•We assessed the potential use of electronic health records (EHR) for frailty tools.•Only 15 % of the instruments reviewed could be generated entirely from EHR data.•Most studies require at least one variable not available in EHR or claims data.•Social and health services variables were least repres...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2020-11, Vol.91, p.104224-104224, Article 104224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We assessed the potential use of electronic health records (EHR) for frailty tools.•Only 15 % of the instruments reviewed could be generated entirely from EHR data.•Most studies require at least one variable not available in EHR or claims data.•Social and health services variables were least represented in frailty instruments.
Despite the availability of many frailty measures to identify older adults at risk, frailty instruments are not routinely used for risk assessment in population health management. Here, we assessed the potential value of electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative claims in providing the necessary data for variables used across various frailty instruments.
The review focused on studies conducted worldwide. Participants included older people aged 50 and older.
We identified frailty instruments published between 2011 and 2018. Frailty variables used in each of the frailty instruments were extracted, grouped, and categorized across health determinants and various clinical factors.
The availability of the extracted frailty variables across various data sources (e.g., EHRs, administrative claims, and surveys) was evaluated by experts.
We identified 135 frailty instruments, which contained 593 unique variables. Clinical determinants of health were the best represented variables across frailty instruments (n = 516; 87 %), unlike social and health services factors (n = 33; ∼5% and n = 32; ∼5%). Most frailty instruments require at least one variable that is not routinely available in EHRs or claims (n = 113; ∼83 %). Only 22 frailty instruments have the potential to completely rely on EHR (structured or free-text data) and/or claims data, and possibly be operationalized on a population-level.
Frailty instruments continue to be highly survey-based. More research is therefore needed to develop EHR-based frailty instruments for population health management. This will permit organizations and societies to stratify risk and better allocate resources among different older adult populations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-4943 1872-6976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104224 |