Combining LS-SVM and GP Regression for the Uncertainty Quantification of the EMI of Power Converters Affected by Several Uncertain Parameters

This article deals with the development of a probabilistic surrogate model for the uncertainty quantification of the voltage output spectral envelope of a power converter with several stochastic parameters. The proposed approach relies on the combination of the least-squares support vector machine (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on electromagnetic compatibility 2020-10, Vol.62 (5), p.1755-1762
Hauptverfasser: Trinchero, Riccardo, Canavero, Flavio G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article deals with the development of a probabilistic surrogate model for the uncertainty quantification of the voltage output spectral envelope of a power converter with several stochastic parameters. The proposed approach relies on the combination of the least-squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) regression with the Gaussian process regression (GPR), but it can suitably be applied to any deterministic regression techniques. As a first step, the LS-SVM regression is used to build an accurate and fast-to-evaluate deterministic model of the system responses starting from a limited set of training samples provided by the full-computational model. Then the GPR is used to provide a probabilistic model of the regression error. The resulting LS-SVM+GPR probabilistic model not only approximates the system responses for any configuration of its input parameters, but also provides an estimation of its prediction uncertainty, such as the confidence intervals (CIs). The above technique has been applied to qualify the uncertainty of the spectral envelope of the output voltage of a buck converter with 17 independent Gaussian parameters. The feasibility and the accuracy of the resulting model have been investigated by comparing its predictions and CI with the ones obtained by five different surrogate models based on state-of-the-art techniques and by the reference Monte Carlo results.
ISSN:0018-9375
1558-187X
DOI:10.1109/TEMC.2019.2962899