Dual HER2 Blockade in Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Review

Background: To investigate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using dual HER2 blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Technology in cancer research & treatment 2020-01, Vol.19, p.1533033820960721, Article 1533033820960721
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Chaokun, Chen, Jing, Xu, Xiangyun, Hu, Xiaochen, Kong, Dejiu, Liang, Gaofeng, Wang, Xinshuai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: To investigate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer. Methods: We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using dual HER2 blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 5, 2020, and all included studies were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias of RCTs, and the statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 software. Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 2758 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that the pCR rates of lapatinib/pertuzumab/neratinib plus trastuzumab versus trastuzumab [relative risk (RR) = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.43; p < 0.001)] and lapatinib plus trastuzumab versus lapatinib (RR = 1.39; 95%CI: 1.25-1.53; p < 0.001) showed a significant statistical difference between dual HER2-blockade treatment and single-agent treatment in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47-1.09; p = 0.123), incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR = 1.04; 95%CI: 0.81-1.33; p = 0.778) and cardiotoxicity(RR = 1.30; 95%CI: 0.81-2.08; p = 0.280), and the pCR rate was unaffected by hormone receptor status. Conclusions: The pCR rate of neoadjuvant dual-target therapy for HER2+ breast cancer was significantly higher than that of single-target therapy. Furthermore, the results indicated that the safety of dual-target therapy is similar to that of single-target therapy.
ISSN:1533-0346
1533-0338
DOI:10.1177/1533033820960721