Prevalence of HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in Turkey and assessment of Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R) test as a screening tool

Objectives We aimed to assess the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R) and three questions (3Qs, European Aids Clinical Society Guidelines) as potential screening tools for HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). In addition, we tried to determine the prevalence and associated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HIV medicine 2021-01, Vol.22 (1), p.60-66
Hauptverfasser: Korten, V, Ay, U, Harı, E, Tigen Tükenmez, E, Gencer, S, Akça Kalem, S, Demirtaş Tatlıdede, A, Gürvit, İH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives We aimed to assess the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE‐R) and three questions (3Qs, European Aids Clinical Society Guidelines) as potential screening tools for HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). In addition, we tried to determine the prevalence and associated factors for HAND among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Turkey. Methods Persons living with HIV were enrolled from two teaching hospitals between March 2018 and September 2018. Participants underwent screening tools, a neuropsychological test battery (NTB) and an assessment of activities of daily living. HAND was diagnosed according to Frascati's criteria and applying the Global Deficit Score (GDS) approach. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to compare the predictive accuracy of ACE‐R to that of the NP test battery. Factors associated with HAND were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The study sample included 162 participants (94% male). The HAND prevalence was 45.7% [asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), 37.7%; mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), 7.4%; HIV‐associated dementia (HAD), 0.6%] according to the Frascati criteria and 31.5% (ANI, 25.9%; MND, 4.9%; HAD, 0.6%) using the GDS. In the ROC analysis, the ACE‐R showed an area under the curve of 0.68 at a cut‐off score of 89. The sensitivity, specificity and correct classification rate of screening tests for HAND diagnosis were as follows: ACE‐R (62.2%, 67%, 64.8%) and 3Qs (10.8%, 88.6%, 53%). In multivariate analysis, only education level (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76–0.92, P ≤ 0.001) was an independent risk factor for HAND. Conclusions HAND is a common comorbidity in PLWH in Turkey. The sensitivities and specificities of 3Qs and the ACE‐R as screening tools are lower than desired.
ISSN:1464-2662
1468-1293
DOI:10.1111/hiv.12957