Reduction of the energy demand of a second-generation bioethanol plant by heat integration and vapour recompression between different columns
The distillation separation technology of an existing second-generation bioethanol production plant is investigated by simulation with a professional flowsheet simulator. The plant contains three distillation columns in series with increasing pressure. Our aim is to compare different Heat Integratio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2020-10, Vol.208, p.118443, Article 118443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The distillation separation technology of an existing second-generation bioethanol production plant is investigated by simulation with a professional flowsheet simulator. The plant contains three distillation columns in series with increasing pressure. Our aim is to compare different Heat Integration (HI) possibilities for the reduction of external heating and cooling energy demands. Besides ethanol and water, 13 further organic pollutant components are taken into account, which were usually neglected in the literature. Several levels of Heat Integration options are studied: first only streams are integrated (HI-A), then a reboiler and a condenser of two different columns are coupled (HI–B). After that streams and columns are heat integrated (HI–C), finally a vapour recompression heat pump is also applied (HI–C + VRC) in a new configuration. The external energy demand and total annual cost of the different configurations are compared. Considerable energy saving can be achieved by all configurations, but the application of a heat pump is not economical in this case. The influence of changing the pressure of the ethanol concentrating column on the different Heat Integration configurations is also investigated.
•Energy saving for the distillation technology of a bioethanol plant is studied.•Different HI possibilities are compared including using a VRC heat pump.•Considerable heating (19–88%) and cooling energy savings are obtained.•The lowest total annual cost is reached by integrating both streams and columns.•The application of the VRC is not economical in this case. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118443 |