Patient blood management: The best approach to transfusion medicine risk management

•Blood transfusions are unavoidably associated to deterministic and probabilistic hazards.•The transfusion requirement is predictable in the most of cases.•Patient Blood Management may greatly reduce - or even avoid - the use of blood components through a proactive approach.•Patient Blood Management...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion and apheresis science 2020-08, Vol.59 (4), p.102779-102779, Article 102779
Hauptverfasser: Bolcato, Matteo, Russo, Marianna, Trentino, Kevin, Isbister, James, Rodriguez, Daniele, Aprile, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Blood transfusions are unavoidably associated to deterministic and probabilistic hazards.•The transfusion requirement is predictable in the most of cases.•Patient Blood Management may greatly reduce - or even avoid - the use of blood components through a proactive approach.•Patient Blood Management programs is essential for decreasing the transfusion-related risks.•Omitting the indications provided by Patient Blood Management may lead to litigation for professional liability. In advanced health systems it is increasingly important to offer effective medical services that have high quality and safety standards. We present an overview of the direct hazards and the indirect hazards associated with blood transfusions. Our aim is to focus on the potential medico-legal impacts of these hazards in the context of clinical risk management, incorporating the accumulating evidence from Patient Blood Management programs. The direct or deterministic hazards of transfusion refer to scenarios where the mechanisms for post transfusion damage are clearly traceable to the blood transfused in a 1:1 cause and effect manner. The indirect hazards can be defined as probabilistic and are associated with transfusion through epidemiological studies. The implementation of Patient Blood Management programs demonstrates that the use of a blood transfusion is not always necessary or unavoidable but can be considered modifiable. Review of the literature confirms that transfusion should not be the default option to manage anemia or blood loss. Instead, accumulating evidence demonstrates that a patient-centred, proactive approach to managing a patient’s own blood is the new standard of care. It thus follows, an adverse transfusion event, where the transfusion was avoidable through the application of patient blood management, may constitute a profile for medical professional medical negligence. In an effort to maximise patient safety, transfusion medicine practice culture needs to shift towards a patient blood management approach, with hospitals implementing it as an important tool to minimize the risks of allogeneic blood transfusion.
ISSN:1473-0502
1878-1683
DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2020.102779