Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser and Autologous Platelet‐Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars: A Comparative Clinico‐Immuno‐Histopathological Study

Background and Objectives To compare the efficacy of autologous platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), ablative fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser, and their combination in the treatment of atrophic acne scars, both clinically and immuno‐histopathologically. Study Design/Materials and Methods Sixty patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2021-04, Vol.53 (4), p.458-467
Hauptverfasser: El‐Hawary, Esraa E., Nassar, Samia, Hodeib, Abeer A., Shareef, Mohamed M., Fawzy, Mohamed M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives To compare the efficacy of autologous platelet‐rich plasma (PRP), ablative fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser, and their combination in the treatment of atrophic acne scars, both clinically and immuno‐histopathologically. Study Design/Materials and Methods Sixty patients were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group 1 received intradermal PRP injection sessions. Group 2 received FCO2 laser sessions. Group 3 received FCO2 laser followed by intradermal PRP injection sessions. Each group received three sessions at monthly intervals. The final assessment took place 3 months after the last session. Skin biopsies were obtained before and 1 month after treatment sessions with pathological evaluation. Results Combined PRP and FCO2 laser‐treated patients had a better clinical response, fewer side effects, and shorter downtime than FCO2 laser alone. PRP‐treated patients had some improvement but significantly lower than the other two groups. Conclusion The current study concluded that a combination of PRP and FCO2 laser is an effective and safe modality in the treatment of atrophic acne scars with better results than PRP or FCO2 laser alone. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.23306