Farmers' perceptions and approaches to detection, treatment and prevention of lameness in pasture‐based dairy herds in New South Wales, Australia
Aims The objective of this study was to investigate farmers' perception of lameness in comparison to the estimated prevalence of lameness in NSW pasture‐based dairies to evaluate farmers' perceptions and approaches to detection, treatment and prevention of lameness. Methods Across‐sectiona...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian veterinary journal 2020-06, Vol.98 (6), p.264-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims
The objective of this study was to investigate farmers' perception of lameness in comparison to the estimated prevalence of lameness in NSW pasture‐based dairies to evaluate farmers' perceptions and approaches to detection, treatment and prevention of lameness.
Methods
Across‐sectional study was conducted on 62 pasture‐based dairy farms across NSW, Australia. The prevalence of lameness in these farms was estimated using locomotion scoring (1–4 scale). A survey was also conducted, using a questionnaire and face‐to‐face interview, to explore farmers' perceived prevalence of lameness and approaches to treatment and prevention.
Results
The prevalence of lameness estimated by farmers was 3.7 times less (mean: 5%; range 0% to 26%) than that determined by locomotion scoring (mean: 19.1%; range 5.0%–44.5%). Approaches to treatment included antimicrobial therapy, hoof inspection with or without application of wooden blocks. In 28% of the farms, the lame cows were managed by farmers or farm staff with no official training in treatment of lame cows. The mean interval from detection of lameness to examination of the affected hoof was almost 55 hours (range 2–720 hours). A very low percentage of farms kept lameness records or implemented lameness preventive strategies such as footbaths and prophylactic foot trimming.
Conclusions
Farmers and farm managers were found to underestimate the prevalence of lameness which could be due to the low level of awareness and can contribute to subsequent lack of implementation of prophylactic procedures and preventive management strategies for lameness. These findings accentuate the need to improve farmers' ability to detect lame cows and to emphasise the importance of recording in order to facilitate the management of lameness in dairy herds. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0005-0423 1751-0813 |
DOI: | 10.1111/avj.12933 |