Multi-laboratory Validation of a New Marine Biodegradation Screening Test for Chemical Persistence Assessment

Current biodegradation screening tests are not specifically designed for persistence assessment of chemicals, often show high inter- and intra-test variability, and often give false negative biodegradation results. Based on previous studies and recommendations, an international ring test involving 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2020-04, Vol.54 (7), p.4210-4220
Hauptverfasser: Ott, Amelie, Martin, Timothy J, Acharya, Kishor, Lyon, Delina Y, Robinson, Nik, Rowles, Bob, Snape, Jason R, Still, Ian, Whale, Graham F, Albright, Vurtice C, Bäverbäck, Petra, Best, Nicola, Commander, Ruth, Eickhoff, Curtis, Finn, Sarah, Hidding, Björn, Maischak, Heiko, Sowders, Katherine A, Taruki, Masanori, Walton, Helen E, Wennberg, Aina Charlotte, Davenport, Russell J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Current biodegradation screening tests are not specifically designed for persistence assessment of chemicals, often show high inter- and intra-test variability, and often give false negative biodegradation results. Based on previous studies and recommendations, an international ring test involving 13 laboratories validated a new test method for marine biodegradation with a focus on improving the reliability of screening to determine the environmental degradation potential of chemicals. The new method incorporated increased bacterial cell concentrations to better represent the microbial diversity; a chemical is likely to be exposed in the sampled environments and ran beyond 60 days, which is the half-life threshold for chemical persistence in the marine environment. The new test provided a more reliable and less variable characterization of the biodegradation behavior of five reference chemicals (sodium benzoate, triethanolamine, 4-nitrophenol, anionic polyacrylamide, and pentachlorophenol), with respect to REACH and OSPAR persistence thresholds, than the current OECD 306 test. The proposed new method provides a cost-effective screening test for non-persistence that could streamline chemical regulation and reduce the cost and animal welfare implications of further higher tier testing.
ISSN:0013-936X
1520-5851
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b07710