Comparative analysis of 2 commercial molecular tests for the detection of gastroenteric viruses on stool samples

Our purpose was to compare the performance of 2 recently introduced molecular tests for the identification of gastrointestinal viral infections. One hundred fecal samples from pediatric patients were analyzed using 2 workflows, each including nucleic acids extraction and multiplex Real-Time PCR: All...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2020-01, Vol.96 (1), p.114893-114893, Article 114893
Hauptverfasser: Sciandra, I., Piccioni, L., Coltella, L., Ranno, S., Giannelli, G., Falasca, F., Antonelli, G., Concato, C., Turriziani, O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our purpose was to compare the performance of 2 recently introduced molecular tests for the identification of gastrointestinal viral infections. One hundred fecal samples from pediatric patients were analyzed using 2 workflows, each including nucleic acids extraction and multiplex Real-Time PCR: Allplex™ GI-Virus Assay and FTD Viral gastroenteritis. The agreement was evaluated calculating Cohen's kappa and applying McNemar's test. Allplex and FTD assays showed 100% overall agreement for Norovirus GI/GII and Sapovirus (κ: 1.00), and 99% for Astrovirus (κ: 0.66). A lower agreement was detected for Adenovirus (89%; κ: 0.72) and Rotavirus (91%, k: 0.53), owing to samples resulted positive only with FTD test. The discrepancies were attributed to a different efficiency of extraction/amplification and to the different Adenovirus serotype specificity of the tests since Allplex detects only AdVF40 and AdVF41. FTD test should be used when non enteric adenovirus could have a clinical significance.
ISSN:0732-8893
1879-0070
DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114893