Retropubic vs transobturator Argus adjustable male sling: Results from a multicenter study

Aims To comparatively analyse outcomes after ARGUS classic and ArgusT adjustable male sling implantation in a real‐world setting. Methods Inclusion criteria encompassed: non‐neurogenic, moderate‐to‐severe stress urinary incontinence (≥2 pads), implantation of an ARGUS classic or ArgusT male sling be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben

Veröffentlicht in:	Neurourology and urodynamics 2020-03, Vol.39 (3), p.987-993
Hauptverfasser:	Loertzer, Hagen, Huesch, Tanja, Kirschner‐Hermanns, Ruth, Anding, Ralf, Rose, Armin, Brehmer, Bernhard, Naumann, Carsten Maik, Queissert, Fabian, Nyarangi‐Dix, Joanne, Homberg, Roland, Grabbert, Markus, Hofmann, Torben, Pottek, Tobias, Hübner, Wilhelm, Haferkamp, Axel, Bauer, Ricarda Michaela, Kretschmer, Alexander
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	adjustable male sling Cancer surgery Comparative analysis Life Sciences & Biomedicine male urinary incontinence Multivariate analysis patient‐reported outcomes post‐prostatectomy incontinence Prostate cancer Regression analysis Science & Technology Urinary incontinence Urological surgery Urology & Nephrology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!