Retropubic vs transobturator Argus adjustable male sling: Results from a multicenter study

Aims To comparatively analyse outcomes after ARGUS classic and ArgusT adjustable male sling implantation in a real‐world setting. Methods Inclusion criteria encompassed: non‐neurogenic, moderate‐to‐severe stress urinary incontinence (≥2 pads), implantation of an ARGUS classic or ArgusT male sling between 2010 and 2012 in a high‐volume center (>150 previous implantations). Functional outcomes were assessed using daily pad usage, 24‐hour pad testing, and International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ‐SF) questionnaires. Continence was defined as zero pads per 24 hours. Complications were graded using Clavien‐Dindo scale. For multivariate analysis, binary logistic regression models were used (P