Mesh Repair in Crohn’s Disease: A Case-Matched Multicenter Study in 234 Patients

Background There are no specific guidelines for ventral hernia management in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. We aimed to assess the risk of septic morbidity after mesh repair in CD. Methods This was a retrospective multicentre study comparing CD and non-CD patients undergoing mesh repair for ventral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of surgery 2020-07, Vol.44 (7), p.2394-2400
Hauptverfasser: Beyer-Berjot, Laura, Moszkowicz, David, Bridoux, Valérie, Schneider, Lucil, Theuil, Luca, François, Yves, Abdalla, Solafah, Cotte, Eddy, Maggiori, Léon, Brouquet, Antoine, Souche, François-Régis, Zerbib, Philippe, Tuech, Jean-Jacques, Panis, Yves, Berdah, Stéphane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There are no specific guidelines for ventral hernia management in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. We aimed to assess the risk of septic morbidity after mesh repair in CD. Methods This was a retrospective multicentre study comparing CD and non-CD patients undergoing mesh repair for ventral hernia (primary or incisional hernia). Controls were matched 1:1 for the presence of a stoma, history of surgical sepsis, hernia size and Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) score. All demographic, pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrieved, including long-term data. Results We included 234 patients, with 114 CD patients. Both groups had comparable VHWG scores ( p  = 0.12), hernia sizes ( p  = 0.11), ASA scores ≥ 3 ( p  = 0.70), body mass index values ( p  = 0.14), presence of stoma (CD 21.9% vs. controls 15%, p  = 0.16), history of sepsis (14% vs. 6.7%, p  = 0.23), rates of malnutrition (4.4% vs. 1.7%, p  = 0.46), rates of incisional hernia (93% vs. 95%, p  = 0.68) and concomitant procedures (18.4% vs. 11.7%, p  = 0.12). CD patients carried a higher risk of postoperative septic morbidity (18.4% vs. 5%, p  = 0.001), entero-prosthetic fistula (7% vs. 0, p 
ISSN:0364-2313
1432-2323
DOI:10.1007/s00268-020-05436-y