Understanding Posttreatment Patient‐Provider Communication and Follow‐Up Care Among Self‐Identified Rural Cancer Survivors in Illinois
Purpose As disparities in rural‐urban cancer survivorship rates continue to widen, optimizing patient‐provider communication regarding timely follow‐up care is a potential mechanism to improving survivorship‐related outcomes. The current study examines sociodemographic and health predictors of postt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of rural health 2020-09, Vol.36 (4), p.549-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
As disparities in rural‐urban cancer survivorship rates continue to widen, optimizing patient‐provider communication regarding timely follow‐up care is a potential mechanism to improving survivorship‐related outcomes. The current study examines sociodemographic and health predictors of posttreatment patient‐provider communication and follow‐up care and associations between written communication and timely follow‐up care for cancer survivors who identify as rural.
Methods
Data were analyzed from posttreatment cancer survivor respondents of the Illinois Rural Cancer Assessment Study. The current study tested associations between sociodemographic variables and health factors on the quality of patient‐provider communication and timely posttreatment follow‐up care, defined as visits ≤ 3 months posttreatment, and associations between the receipt of written patient‐provider communication on timely posttreatment follow‐up care.
Results
Among 90 self‐identified rural cancer survivors, respondents with annual incomes < $50,000 and ≤ High School diploma were more likely to report a high quality of posttreatment patient‐provider communication. Posttreatment written communication was reported by 62% of the respondents and 52% reported timely follow‐up visits during the first 3 years of posttreatment care. Patients who reported receiving written patient‐provider communication were more likely to have timely posttreatment follow‐up care after completing active treatment than patients who had not received written patient‐provider communication.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that written patient‐provider communication improved timely follow‐up care for self‐identified rural cancer survivors. This research supports policy and practice that recommend the receipt of written survivorship care plans. Implementation of written survivorship care recommendations has the potential to improve survivorship care for rural cancer survivors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-765X 1748-0361 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jrh.12414 |