Effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy on clinical outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Background Few studies were reported on the comparison of clinical outcomes between intensity-modulated radiotherapy （IMRT） and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy （3D-CRT） in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme （GBM）.This study aimed to determine whether IMRT improves clinical outcomes compared with 3D-CRT in patients with GBM.Methods The records of 54 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM from July 2009 to December 2010 were reviewed.The patients underwent postoperative IMRT or 3D-CRT with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to estimate differences of patients＇ survival.Results The median follow-up was 13 months.Of the 54 patients,fifty （92.6%） completed the combined modality treatment.The 1-year overall survival rate （OS） was 79.6%.The pattern of failure was predominantly local.A comparative analysis revealed that no statistical difference was observed between the IMRT group （n=21） and the 3D-CRT group （n=33） for 1-year OS （89.6% vs.75.8%,P=0.795）,or 1-year progression-free survival （PFS） （61.0% vs.45.5%,P=0.867）.In dosimetric comparison,IMRT seemed to allow better sparing of organs at risk than 3D-CRT did （P=0.050,P=0.055）.However,there was no significant difference for toxicities of irradiation between the IMRT group and the 3D-CRT group.Conclusions Our preliminary results suggested that delivering standard radiation doses by IMRT is unlikely to improve local control or overall survival for GBM compared with 3D-CRT.Given this lack of survival benefit and increased costs of IMRT,the utilization of IMRT treatment for GBM needs to be carefully rationalized.