Effects of Losartan on acute atrial electrical remodeling
Background Atrial electrical remodeling (AER) contributes to the maintainance of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was to compare the effects of Losartan with those of Diltiazem on tachycardiainduced acute AER in rabbits.Methods Twenty-one rabbits paced with maximal atrial capture rate for 3 hour...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chinese medical journal 2004-05, Vol.117 (5), p.643-646 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Atrial electrical remodeling (AER) contributes to the maintainance of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was to compare the effects of Losartan with those of Diltiazem on tachycardiainduced acute AER in rabbits.Methods Twenty-one rabbits paced with maximal atrial capture rate for 3 hours in the right atrium (RA) were randomly divided into saline group, Diltiazem group and Losartan group. After autonomic blockage, we measured atrial effective refractory period (AERP), AERP rate adapting feature, AERP dispersion and RA conduction time at basic cycle lengths (BCLs) of 200 ms and 150 ms at baseline,0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 and 3 hours after rapid atrial pacing.Results In the saline group, there was a prompt decrease in AERP as a result of rapid atrial pacing,and AERP200 and AERP150 were shortened sharply within 0.5 hour of pacing (30.2 ± 10.5 ms and 24. 1 ±9. 1 ms, respectively). The AERP did not change dramatically in the Diltiazem and Losartan groups. In the saline group, the value of (AERP200 -AERP150)/50 ms in high RA was 0. 17 ±0. 08 at baseline and became significantly smaller at 0. 5 hour (0.08 ±0. 06), 1 hour (0. 09 ±0.06), 2 hours (0.08 ±0.04) and 3 hours (0.09 ±0.05) (all P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0366-6999 2542-5641 |