解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗

明代中期,“吴门画派”远承元代文人画的疏放简淡而逐渐取代“浙派”,在文人画发展史上影响深远。但作为“吴门四家”之一的仇英常因“精工巧丽”而被贬为“行家”之流。

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:文物鉴定与鉴赏 2011 (1), p.78-85
1. Verfasser: 吴晶莹
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title 文物鉴定与鉴赏
container_volume
creator 吴晶莹
description 明代中期,“吴门画派”远承元代文人画的疏放简淡而逐渐取代“浙派”,在文人画发展史上影响深远。但作为“吴门四家”之一的仇英常因“精工巧丽”而被贬为“行家”之流。
doi_str_mv 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8697.2011.01.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cass_wanfa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_wwjdyjs201101017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cass_id>36480027</cass_id><cqvip_id>36480027</cqvip_id><wanfj_id>wwjdyjs201101017</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>36480027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c787-9f643dafe7482eec4588b61cf876ddab0c02e793f1342f1404c825e91423114f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUEtLw0AQ3oOCpfYHeBUPXhJ3N5vdzVGKLyh4KXgMeW1NLCm6SPHWg9KDIlVKLSJWsNCTiLfSFH-M5NGfYUqLMh_MMN9jYADYQlDVDGrsBKovZagiyojCqcFUDBFS4RxsBRT-9mugJKVvQ6hjhJBOC-BkNnqffUZx1J7dfmVRP-tG2fN12mvHk0ly10ta30nn4afVzZHcTNPXTtq_j8cf6csg6eTDMBmOFq54-pZFg9wbTx7T8dM6WBVWXXqlZS-C6v5etXyoVI4Pjsq7FcVhnCmGoERzLeExwrHnOUTn3KbIEZxR17Vs6EDsMUMTSCNYIAKJw7HuGYhgDSEitCLYXsQ2rVBYYc0MGpcXYX7QbDYD9yqQ80fAvFgu3VhIHUtKM5TSNTVKOIR4zm0uudNGWDv38yDbcs6EX_f-Rb98G4gl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗</title><source>国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)</source><creator>吴晶莹</creator><creatorcontrib>吴晶莹</creatorcontrib><description>明代中期,“吴门画派”远承元代文人画的疏放简淡而逐渐取代“浙派”,在文人画发展史上影响深远。但作为“吴门四家”之一的仇英常因“精工巧丽”而被贬为“行家”之流。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1674-8697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8697.2011.01.017</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>时代出版传媒股份有限公司</publisher><subject>互渗 ; 仇英 ; 传统 ; 文人化 ; 明中期 ; 明代中期 ; 绘画 ; 解读</subject><ispartof>文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2011 (1), p.78-85</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/89705X/89705X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>吴晶莹</creatorcontrib><title>解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗</title><title>文物鉴定与鉴赏</title><description>明代中期,“吴门画派”远承元代文人画的疏放简淡而逐渐取代“浙派”,在文人画发展史上影响深远。但作为“吴门四家”之一的仇英常因“精工巧丽”而被贬为“行家”之流。</description><subject>互渗</subject><subject>仇英</subject><subject>传统</subject><subject>文人化</subject><subject>明中期</subject><subject>明代中期</subject><subject>绘画</subject><subject>解读</subject><issn>1674-8697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFUEtLw0AQ3oOCpfYHeBUPXhJ3N5vdzVGKLyh4KXgMeW1NLCm6SPHWg9KDIlVKLSJWsNCTiLfSFH-M5NGfYUqLMh_MMN9jYADYQlDVDGrsBKovZagiyojCqcFUDBFS4RxsBRT-9mugJKVvQ6hjhJBOC-BkNnqffUZx1J7dfmVRP-tG2fN12mvHk0ly10ta30nn4afVzZHcTNPXTtq_j8cf6csg6eTDMBmOFq54-pZFg9wbTx7T8dM6WBVWXXqlZS-C6v5etXyoVI4Pjsq7FcVhnCmGoERzLeExwrHnOUTn3KbIEZxR17Vs6EDsMUMTSCNYIAKJw7HuGYhgDSEitCLYXsQ2rVBYYc0MGpcXYX7QbDYD9yqQ80fAvFgu3VhIHUtKM5TSNTVKOIR4zm0uudNGWDv38yDbcs6EX_f-Rb98G4gl</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>吴晶莹</creator><general>时代出版传媒股份有限公司</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W93</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NSCOK</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗</title><author>吴晶莹</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c787-9f643dafe7482eec4588b61cf876ddab0c02e793f1342f1404c825e91423114f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>互渗</topic><topic>仇英</topic><topic>传统</topic><topic>文人化</topic><topic>明中期</topic><topic>明代中期</topic><topic>绘画</topic><topic>解读</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>吴晶莹</creatorcontrib><collection>中文科技期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-社会科学</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>国家哲学社会科学文献中心 (National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation)</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>文物鉴定与鉴赏</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>吴晶莹</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗</atitle><jtitle>文物鉴定与鉴赏</jtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>1674-8697</issn><abstract>明代中期,“吴门画派”远承元代文人画的疏放简淡而逐渐取代“浙派”,在文人画发展史上影响深远。但作为“吴门四家”之一的仇英常因“精工巧丽”而被贬为“行家”之流。</abstract><pub>时代出版传媒股份有限公司</pub><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1674-8697.2011.01.017</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1674-8697
ispartof 文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2011 (1), p.78-85
issn 1674-8697
language chi
recordid cdi_wanfang_journals_wwjdyjs201101017
source 国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库 (National Social Sciences Database)
subjects 互渗
仇英
传统
文人化
明中期
明代中期
绘画
解读
title 解读仇英绘画的文人化倾向——兼析明中期后两大绘画传统的互渗
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cass_wanfa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E8%A7%A3%E8%AF%BB%E4%BB%87%E8%8B%B1%E7%BB%98%E7%94%BB%E7%9A%84%E6%96%87%E4%BA%BA%E5%8C%96%E5%80%BE%E5%90%91%E2%80%94%E2%80%94%E5%85%BC%E6%9E%90%E6%98%8E%E4%B8%AD%E6%9C%9F%E5%90%8E%E4%B8%A4%E5%A4%A7%E7%BB%98%E7%94%BB%E4%BC%A0%E7%BB%9F%E7%9A%84%E4%BA%92%E6%B8%97&rft.jtitle=%E6%96%87%E7%89%A9%E9%89%B4%E5%AE%9A%E4%B8%8E%E9%89%B4%E8%B5%8F&rft.au=%E5%90%B4%E6%99%B6%E8%8E%B9&rft.date=2011&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=1674-8697&rft_id=info:doi/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8697.2011.01.017&rft_dat=%3Ccass_wanfa%3E36480027%3C/cass_wanfa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cass_id=36480027&rft_cqvip_id=36480027&rft_wanfj_id=wwjdyjs201101017&rfr_iscdi=true