Wind tunnel investigation of different engine layouts of a blended-wing-body transport
A 2% scale, cruising version of a 450-seat class Blended-Wing-Body (BWB) transport was tested in the China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center’s FL-26 2.4-by-2.4-meter subsonic wind tunnel. The focus of the wind tunnel test was to investigate the aerodynamic performance of the latest BWB tra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chinese journal of aeronautics 2023-09, Vol.36 (9), p.123-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A 2% scale, cruising version of a 450-seat class Blended-Wing-Body (BWB) transport was tested in the China Aerodynamic Research and Development Center’s FL-26 2.4-by-2.4-meter subsonic wind tunnel. The focus of the wind tunnel test was to investigate the aerodynamic performance of the latest BWB transport design, which would also aid in choosing a final engine arrangement in the three most potential engine integration layouts. The wind tunnel model can be tested with and without the nacelle and has three sets of different nacelle/tail integration positions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed in engine-aircraft integration design to find appropriate nacelle installing parameters of each layout. The comparison of CFD with experimental results shows good agreement. Wind tunnel measurements indicate that the tail-mounted engine layout produces the minimum drag penalty, while the fuselage-mounted engine layout increases drag the most. Experimental pressure measurement illustrates the effect of nacelle integration on the wing-body surface pressure distribution. This experimental and numerical research provides a reference for future BWB Propulsion-Airframe Integration (PAI) design. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1000-9361 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.027 |