水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究
【目的】探究鄱阳湖区汛涝期稻田淹涝背景下,不同淹涝退水过程对水稻抗氧化性以及产量的影响。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,在中稻拔节期分别设置泥沙量(S0: 0 kg/m3;S1: 0.10 kg/m3;S2: 0.25 kg/m3)、淹没历时(F1: 3 d;F2: 6 d)和退水历时(D1: 3 d;D2: 6 d)不同处理组合,同时设置正常控水生长的对照(CK),共13个处理。通过测定水稻剑叶SPAD值、叶片抗氧化性酶活性以及产量,研究水稻生长对不同淹涝退水过程的响应机制。【结果】①水稻叶片SPAD值随泥沙量、淹没历时或退水历时的增加而减少,在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最低值,S2F2D2处理在持...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao 2022-07, Vol.41 (7), p.111-118 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 118 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | WANG Bingrui CAI Shuo GUO Qiaoling SHI, Hong SHI Yuanzhi ZHAO, Shujun JIANG Chengming |
description | 【目的】探究鄱阳湖区汛涝期稻田淹涝背景下,不同淹涝退水过程对水稻抗氧化性以及产量的影响。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,在中稻拔节期分别设置泥沙量(S0: 0 kg/m3;S1: 0.10 kg/m3;S2: 0.25 kg/m3)、淹没历时(F1: 3 d;F2: 6 d)和退水历时(D1: 3 d;D2: 6 d)不同处理组合,同时设置正常控水生长的对照(CK),共13个处理。通过测定水稻剑叶SPAD值、叶片抗氧化性酶活性以及产量,研究水稻生长对不同淹涝退水过程的响应机制。【结果】①水稻叶片SPAD值随泥沙量、淹没历时或退水历时的增加而减少,在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最低值,S2F2D2处理在持续淹没达到6 d时较CK下降幅度最大(46.40%)。②水稻叶片SOD活性、POD活性及MDA量随淹涝退水过程先上升后下降,均在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最大值。③水稻经不同淹涝退水处理后表现为千粒质量显著下降(P<0.05),进而导致水稻产量降低,其中S0F2D2处理和S2F2D2处理较CK减产幅度最大,分别达到52.22%和52.00%。【结论】受拔节期不同淹涝退水过程的影响,中稻抗氧化性增强、产量下降。与泥沙量相比,淹没历时和退水历时是影响水稻产量的主要因素,淹没退水历时越长产量减幅越大。在试验条件下,将中稻拔节期淹涝退水历时控制在6 d内,可有效减少水稻受灾、降低洪涝损失。 |
doi_str_mv | 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022195 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_wanfang_journals_ggps202207015</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>ggps202207015</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>ggps202207015</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1285-9f8407069917e06df880db312fdc120108127955c4d8c4920578020bb2a71ead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj01LAlEYhe-iIDH_QbtoOdP7vneu995liH2A0KbWMs6HZDGak7R1EQhWuFAKgqCdtmoWYWiL_kwzk_-iEYNWZ3EensNhbAvBRC6IdhumE5yfmfV6KzQJiFCLNZbDoiSDc5QbrBCGDQAgAVJonmPlJHpPJ59J_zGJxvHdQ9Idx4P-93y86A3it1lWpaMo-Zgl0-dFt5vBP1-9dHKbPt3Ew_t4PkpfRunrdJOt-_ZF6BX-Ms9O98snpUOjcnxwVNqrGC0kJQztKwskFLVG6UHR9ZUCt8aRfNdBAgSFJLUQjuUqx9IEQiogqNXIlujZLs-znZX32g58O6hXG81OO8gWq8vHy8OZHkXGba-4Vrt52fHCq3-Qg1ZEZAniv6tMcSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098222452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>WANG Bingrui ; CAI Shuo ; GUO Qiaoling ; SHI, Hong ; SHI Yuanzhi ; ZHAO, Shujun ; JIANG Chengming</creator><creatorcontrib>WANG Bingrui ; CAI Shuo ; GUO Qiaoling ; SHI, Hong ; SHI Yuanzhi ; ZHAO, Shujun ; JIANG Chengming</creatorcontrib><description>【目的】探究鄱阳湖区汛涝期稻田淹涝背景下,不同淹涝退水过程对水稻抗氧化性以及产量的影响。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,在中稻拔节期分别设置泥沙量(S0: 0 kg/m3;S1: 0.10 kg/m3;S2: 0.25 kg/m3)、淹没历时(F1: 3 d;F2: 6 d)和退水历时(D1: 3 d;D2: 6 d)不同处理组合,同时设置正常控水生长的对照(CK),共13个处理。通过测定水稻剑叶SPAD值、叶片抗氧化性酶活性以及产量,研究水稻生长对不同淹涝退水过程的响应机制。【结果】①水稻叶片SPAD值随泥沙量、淹没历时或退水历时的增加而减少,在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最低值,S2F2D2处理在持续淹没达到6 d时较CK下降幅度最大(46.40%)。②水稻叶片SOD活性、POD活性及MDA量随淹涝退水过程先上升后下降,均在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最大值。③水稻经不同淹涝退水处理后表现为千粒质量显著下降(P<0.05),进而导致水稻产量降低,其中S0F2D2处理和S2F2D2处理较CK减产幅度最大,分别达到52.22%和52.00%。【结论】受拔节期不同淹涝退水过程的影响,中稻抗氧化性增强、产量下降。与泥沙量相比,淹没历时和退水历时是影响水稻产量的主要因素,淹没退水历时越长产量减幅越大。在试验条件下,将中稻拔节期淹涝退水历时控制在6 d内,可有效减少水稻受灾、降低洪涝损失。</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-3317</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022195</identifier><language>chi ; eng</language><publisher>Xinxiang City: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</publisher><subject>Crop yield ; Drainage ; Elongation ; Flooding ; Grain ; Leaves ; Nutrients ; Oxidation ; Oxidation resistance ; Rainy season ; Recession ; Resistance factors ; Rice ; Sediments ; Surface water ; Waterlogging</subject><ispartof>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao, 2022-07, Vol.41 (7), p.111-118</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/ggps/ggps.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>WANG Bingrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUO Qiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI Yuanzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAO, Shujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG Chengming</creatorcontrib><title>水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究</title><title>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</title><description>【目的】探究鄱阳湖区汛涝期稻田淹涝背景下,不同淹涝退水过程对水稻抗氧化性以及产量的影响。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,在中稻拔节期分别设置泥沙量(S0: 0 kg/m3;S1: 0.10 kg/m3;S2: 0.25 kg/m3)、淹没历时(F1: 3 d;F2: 6 d)和退水历时(D1: 3 d;D2: 6 d)不同处理组合,同时设置正常控水生长的对照(CK),共13个处理。通过测定水稻剑叶SPAD值、叶片抗氧化性酶活性以及产量,研究水稻生长对不同淹涝退水过程的响应机制。【结果】①水稻叶片SPAD值随泥沙量、淹没历时或退水历时的增加而减少,在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最低值,S2F2D2处理在持续淹没达到6 d时较CK下降幅度最大(46.40%)。②水稻叶片SOD活性、POD活性及MDA量随淹涝退水过程先上升后下降,均在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最大值。③水稻经不同淹涝退水处理后表现为千粒质量显著下降(P<0.05),进而导致水稻产量降低,其中S0F2D2处理和S2F2D2处理较CK减产幅度最大,分别达到52.22%和52.00%。【结论】受拔节期不同淹涝退水过程的影响,中稻抗氧化性增强、产量下降。与泥沙量相比,淹没历时和退水历时是影响水稻产量的主要因素,淹没退水历时越长产量减幅越大。在试验条件下,将中稻拔节期淹涝退水历时控制在6 d内,可有效减少水稻受灾、降低洪涝损失。</description><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation resistance</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Recession</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Waterlogging</subject><issn>1672-3317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpFj01LAlEYhe-iIDH_QbtoOdP7vneu995liH2A0KbWMs6HZDGak7R1EQhWuFAKgqCdtmoWYWiL_kwzk_-iEYNWZ3EensNhbAvBRC6IdhumE5yfmfV6KzQJiFCLNZbDoiSDc5QbrBCGDQAgAVJonmPlJHpPJ59J_zGJxvHdQ9Idx4P-93y86A3it1lWpaMo-Zgl0-dFt5vBP1-9dHKbPt3Ew_t4PkpfRunrdJOt-_ZF6BX-Ms9O98snpUOjcnxwVNqrGC0kJQztKwskFLVG6UHR9ZUCt8aRfNdBAgSFJLUQjuUqx9IEQiogqNXIlujZLs-znZX32g58O6hXG81OO8gWq8vHy8OZHkXGba-4Vrt52fHCq3-Qg1ZEZAniv6tMcSY</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>WANG Bingrui</creator><creator>CAI Shuo</creator><creator>GUO Qiaoling</creator><creator>SHI, Hong</creator><creator>SHI Yuanzhi</creator><creator>ZHAO, Shujun</creator><creator>JIANG Chengming</creator><general>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</general><general>江西省灌溉试验中心站,南昌330201%江西省灌溉试验中心站,南昌330201%东华理工大学,南昌330013%南京水利科学研究院,南京210029%三峡大学,湖北宜昌443002</general><general>东华理工大学,南昌330013</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究</title><author>WANG Bingrui ; CAI Shuo ; GUO Qiaoling ; SHI, Hong ; SHI Yuanzhi ; ZHAO, Shujun ; JIANG Chengming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1285-9f8407069917e06df880db312fdc120108127955c4d8c4920578020bb2a71ead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi ; eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation resistance</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Recession</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Waterlogging</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WANG Bingrui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAI Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUO Qiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI Yuanzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAO, Shujun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JIANG Chengming</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><jtitle>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WANG Bingrui</au><au>CAI Shuo</au><au>GUO Qiaoling</au><au>SHI, Hong</au><au>SHI Yuanzhi</au><au>ZHAO, Shujun</au><au>JIANG Chengming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究</atitle><jtitle>Guanʻgai paishui xuebao</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>111-118</pages><issn>1672-3317</issn><abstract>【目的】探究鄱阳湖区汛涝期稻田淹涝背景下,不同淹涝退水过程对水稻抗氧化性以及产量的影响。【方法】采用盆栽试验方法,在中稻拔节期分别设置泥沙量(S0: 0 kg/m3;S1: 0.10 kg/m3;S2: 0.25 kg/m3)、淹没历时(F1: 3 d;F2: 6 d)和退水历时(D1: 3 d;D2: 6 d)不同处理组合,同时设置正常控水生长的对照(CK),共13个处理。通过测定水稻剑叶SPAD值、叶片抗氧化性酶活性以及产量,研究水稻生长对不同淹涝退水过程的响应机制。【结果】①水稻叶片SPAD值随泥沙量、淹没历时或退水历时的增加而减少,在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最低值,S2F2D2处理在持续淹没达到6 d时较CK下降幅度最大(46.40%)。②水稻叶片SOD活性、POD活性及MDA量随淹涝退水过程先上升后下降,均在淹没结束并开始退水前达到最大值。③水稻经不同淹涝退水处理后表现为千粒质量显著下降(P<0.05),进而导致水稻产量降低,其中S0F2D2处理和S2F2D2处理较CK减产幅度最大,分别达到52.22%和52.00%。【结论】受拔节期不同淹涝退水过程的影响,中稻抗氧化性增强、产量下降。与泥沙量相比,淹没历时和退水历时是影响水稻产量的主要因素,淹没退水历时越长产量减幅越大。在试验条件下,将中稻拔节期淹涝退水历时控制在6 d内,可有效减少水稻受灾、降低洪涝损失。</abstract><cop>Xinxiang City</cop><pub>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Farmland Irrigation Research Institute Editorial Office of Journal of Irrigation and Drainage</pub><doi>10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022195</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1672-3317 |
ispartof | Guanʻgai paishui xuebao, 2022-07, Vol.41 (7), p.111-118 |
issn | 1672-3317 |
language | chi ; eng |
recordid | cdi_wanfang_journals_ggps202207015 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Crop yield Drainage Elongation Flooding Grain Leaves Nutrients Oxidation Oxidation resistance Rainy season Recession Resistance factors Rice Sediments Surface water Waterlogging |
title | 水稻抗氧化性及产量对稻田淹涝退水过程的响应研究 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A43%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E6%B0%B4%E7%A8%BB%E6%8A%97%E6%B0%A7%E5%8C%96%E6%80%A7%E5%8F%8A%E4%BA%A7%E9%87%8F%E5%AF%B9%E7%A8%BB%E7%94%B0%E6%B7%B9%E6%B6%9D%E9%80%80%E6%B0%B4%E8%BF%87%E7%A8%8B%E7%9A%84%E5%93%8D%E5%BA%94%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6&rft.jtitle=Guan%CA%BBgai%20paishui%20xuebao&rft.au=WANG%20Bingrui&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=111-118&rft.issn=1672-3317&rft_id=info:doi/10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2022195&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_proqu%3Eggps202207015%3C/wanfang_jour_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098222452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_wanfj_id=ggps202207015&rfr_iscdi=true |