Performance evaluation of hybrid constructed wetlands for the treatment of municipal wastewater in developing countries

In developing countries, high cost of conventional wastewater treatment is a major hindrance in its application. Constructed wetlands (CWs) offer low-cost and effective solution to this issue. The current study aimed to evaluate an innovative maneuver of CWs i.e. hybrid flow constructed wetlands (HC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chinese journal of chemical engineering 2020-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1717-1724
Hauptverfasser: Haydar, Sajjad, Anis, Mehwish, Afaq, Misbah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In developing countries, high cost of conventional wastewater treatment is a major hindrance in its application. Constructed wetlands (CWs) offer low-cost and effective solution to this issue. The current study aimed to evaluate an innovative maneuver of CWs i.e. hybrid flow constructed wetlands (HCWs) for municipal wastewater (MWW). The HCWs included two lab scale CWs; one horizontal and one vertical, in series. Local plant species were used. HCWs were operated in both, batch and continuous mode. Batch mode was used to (1) optimize detention time and (2) find pollutants removal efficiency. Continuous operation (at batch optimized retention time) was carried out for the evaluation of mass removal rate, r (g·m−2·d−1), volumetric rate constant, Kv (per day) and areal rate constant, Ka (m·d−1). Among two local plants tested, Pistia stratiotes gave better removal efficiency than Typha. Optimum detention time in HCWs was found to be 8 days (4 + 4 each). The optimum COD, BOD, TSS, TKN and P removal observed for Pistia stratiotes planted HCWs was 80%, 84%, 82%, 71% and 88% respectively. Effluent standards for COD, BOD and TSS were met at optimum conditions. The values of Ka and Kv demonstrated that more removal occurred in vertical flow as compared to horizontal flow CW. [Display omitted]
ISSN:1004-9541
2210-321X
DOI:10.1016/j.cjche.2020.02.017