Transformative, transgressive social learning: rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction

•Pedagogies are required that are not constrained by current use of limited concepts, or by disciplinary decadence.•Concepts such as resilience are problematic if they hold unsustainable systems and patterns in place.•Disruptive capacity building and transgressive pedagogies are needed for a more su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in environmental sustainability 2015-10, Vol.16, p.73-80
Hauptverfasser: Lotz-Sisitka, Heila, Wals, Arjen EJ, Kronlid, David, McGarry, Dylan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Pedagogies are required that are not constrained by current use of limited concepts, or by disciplinary decadence.•Concepts such as resilience are problematic if they hold unsustainable systems and patterns in place.•Disruptive capacity building and transgressive pedagogies are needed for a more sustainable world.•Transformative, transgressive forms of learning requires co-learning in multi-voiced and multi-actor formations.•Higher education should provide possibilities for engaged, lived experience of transformative praxis for students. The nature of the sustainability challenges currently at hand is such that dominant pedagogies and forms of learning that characterize higher education need to be reconsidered to enable students and staff to deal with accelerating change, increasing complexity, contested knowledge claims and inevitable uncertainty. In this contribution we identified four streams of emerging transformative, transgressive learning research and praxis in the sustainability sciences that appear generative of a higher education pedagogy that appears more responsive to the key challenges of our time: (1) reflexive social learning and capabilities theory, (2) critical phenomenology, (3) socio-cultural and cultural historical activity theory, and (4) new social movement, postcolonial and decolonisation theory. The paper critiques the current tendency in sustainability science and learning to rely on resilience and adaptive capacity building and argues that in order to break with maladaptive resilience of unsustainable systems it is essential to strengthen transgressive learning and disruptive capacity-building.
ISSN:1877-3435
1877-3443
1877-3443
DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018